Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GEFELL Andrew P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
| 2 | FLOT Tai A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 25% |
| 3 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 3 | GHAYALOD ansh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% |
| 5 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 6 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
| 7 | ZHAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 8 | LIM Brandon | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 9 | SUBA Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 10 | CIEMINS Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 11 | WONG Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 12 | CHEN Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 13 | YU xiaodao | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 14 | ATWOOD Griffin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 15 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | WEI William | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 17 | KHOTLINE Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | - |
| 18 | WANG Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 19 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 20 | LOO Jason | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 21 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 27% | 3% |
| 21 | SRIVATS Vedh | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 23 | TOZZI Massimo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 24 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | JI Johnson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 26 | CAI Jeff | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 27 | LIANG Morgan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 28 | COOKSON Leonardo | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 30 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 100% | 75% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | LUCAS William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
| 32 | FIROOZI Sam | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
| 34 | GORDON Samuel | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 35 | HE Bowen | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 36 | CHENG Brandon | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | DESAUTELS Connor | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 38 | MACK Justin | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | LORENZ Evan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 40 | BHASKAR Dhananjay K. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 41 | CRAWFORD William | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | JAIDEVA Aakash | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 43 | SAYAR Luke | 100% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | DOMINIQUE Remson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 1% |
| 45 | ZAY Elijah | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | SHAPIRO Simon | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | WU Vincent | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | ZHANG Simon | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 49 | HAUSLER Jayden | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | JAGANNATHAN Ajay | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | MATTOO Dhruv | 100% | 94% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 52 | AMES Kylan | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | MARTINEZ Luke | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | SONG Ryan | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | MUKHERJEE Aryan | 100% | 49% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.