16th Annual Yellow Jacket Open

Senior Mixed Épée

Sunday, March 1, 2026 at 9:00 AM

Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 FULLERTON Houston T. V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.7 6 +0.3
2 HUTTO Joshua V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
3 KULIKOWSKI Adam J. V V V V V D V V V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
3 IRWIN Peter V V V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
5 WEBB Jacob T. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
6 ZHOU Alec Q. V D V V V V V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
7 WEISSMAN Kai E. V D V V V V V V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
8 CORLEY Avery D V V V V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
9 JEONG Arisu V V V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
10 MOORE Jeremy S. V V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
11 WILSON Andrew T. V V V V V V V V V D 3.6 6 +2.4
11 PANTALONE giuseppe A. V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
13 ARZT Nicholas V V D V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
14 WANG Bryan D V V V V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
15 LABROZZI Aidan V V V V V D V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
16 RAVI Arjun V D D V D V V V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
17 MUMMIDI Rishi V V V V V V V V D 3.6 6 +2.4
18 ELLIOTT Wyatt V V V D V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
19 CHENG Thomas D V V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
20 SHOUSHA Yassin V V V V D V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
21 ALVIOR Jonathan Adrian V V D V V V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
22 BATISTA Julian V V V D V V V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
23 FREY Wayne N. V V V D V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
24 TYSON Charlie V V V V V D V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
25 ALVIOR Jacob A. D V V V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
26 MODULLA Yathin R. V V V D V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
27 THOMPSON Daniel M. V D V V V D V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
28 HICKS Matthew D V V V D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
29 DAVIDENKO Alexander V V V D D D V V D 5.1 3 -2.1
30 DIEKER Edwin D V D V D V V V D 1.7 3 +1.3
31 JIANG Harry D D V D V V V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
32 HUGHES Eric V D V V D D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
33 PAYNE Gareth V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
34 SCALES Chad V V V V V V V D 4.3 6 +1.7
35 HERARD Weiman V V V V V V V D 3.6 6 +2.4
36 NGUYEN Hubert D V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
37 SARSOUR Ghaleb V V V V D V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
38 NAM Nathaniel V D V V V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
39 MEGGERS Davin V V V V D V D 3.3 4 +0.7
40 WRIGHT Alex V V D V V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
41 KOSSMANN Alexander D V V D V V V D 4.0 4 -
42 SIGG Noah V D V V V D V D 1.5 4 +2.5
43 MCFARLAND John G. D V V D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
44 GILBRETH Geoffrey (Chance) V D V V V D V D 4.7 4 -0.7
44 SORANNO James V V D V V D V D 2.2 4 +1.8
46 OLSON Clayton M. D V V D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
47 KRIEGER Jack V V D V D V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
48 LANGE Eric A. D V D V V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
49 CARRIE Konnor V D V D V D V D 4.4 3 -1.4
50 LEE Winston V V D D D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
51 QUINTIN Guillaume D V D V D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
52 SCORDINSKY Liam V V D D D V V D 1.5 3 +1.5
53 MALONE Jacob V V D D D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
54 CHEN Andrew D D D V V V V D 3.0 3 -
55 BEDULLA Asher D D V D V V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
56 BONILHA-VAN'T HOF Rafael D V V D V D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
57 IBANEZ Julien V D D D V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
58 WAGNER Cosette D D D V V V D 1.5 2 +0.5
59 WYNN Paul V V V D D D V D 3.0 3 -
60 BUZINKAI Brennan V D D D V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
61 MUNAGAPATI Vishwa D D D D V V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
62 SUN Yuzheng V D V D D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
63 XHEMALI Nathan V D D V D D V D 3.9 2 -1.9
64 BELL Leo P. D D D V V D 2.4 1 -1.4
65 ERIZE Alejandro V V D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
66 ANGADI Shreyas V D V V D D 2.5 3 +0.5
67 MURO Ryan V D V V D D D 4.5 3 -1.5
68 CREMONA Viola Maria D V V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
69 GUNDUBOGULA Shrihan D V D D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
70 DONGES Anna V V D D D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
72 HEINZE Luke H. V D V V D D D 2.9 3 +0.1
73 KIM Ian D V D V D V D 1.6 3 +1.4
74 MOYERS Diego D V D V V D D 2.6 3 +0.4
75 CALINSKY Edward V V D V D D D 3.8 3 -0.8
76 SOU Barry V V D D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
77 PEACOCK Audrey D D V D V D 0.9 2 +1.1
78 MARSHALL Wesley V D V D D D D 5.0 2 -3.0
79 RAGLAND Ben D D D V D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
80 BATCHU ashrith V D D V D D D 2.9 2 -0.9
81 HAWKINS Sophia D D D D V V D 3.6 2 -1.6
82 CUPO Anthony D V D V D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
83 HOUSMANS Emma D D V D D V D 1.0 2 +1.0
84 DING Tommy V V D D D D D 2.9 2 -0.9
85 SONG Apolo D D V V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
86 FERRARO Nicholas D D D D V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
87 ABEL Nathanael V V D D D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
88 KARPF Jonah D D V V D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
89 HUA Daniel V D D D V D D 1.6 2 +0.4
90 CARRERO Quentin D V V D D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
91 SUMMEY Travis D V D V D D D 2.0 2 -
92 BEST Sydney D D V V D D D 1.4 2 +0.6
93 HUSZAR Sara D V V D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
94 BARRETT John D V D D D V D 0.3 2 +1.7
95 SOKOLOWSKI Olivia D D V D D 0.2 1 +0.8
96 PHILLIPS Carson D D V D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
97 SIGGINS Wally D D V D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
98 SEARS SARAH V D D D D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
99 KINSELLA John D D V D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
100 SZETO Octavius D D D D V D D 2.4 1 -1.4
101 JOHNSTON Jacob D D D D V D D 2.4 1 -1.4
102 YAO Sophia D D V D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
103 BEDWORTH Paige V D D D D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
104 GEISSLER Maximilian D D D D V D D 2.3 1 -1.3
105 KAWALE Rachita V D D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
106 LAND John D D D D D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
107 HICKS Joseph D D V D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
108 CLOPPER Meredith D D D D D V D 1.4 1 -0.4
109 LE BLANC Anna D D D D V D D 0.4 1 +0.6
109 GARG Shiv D D D D V D D 2.5 1 -1.5
111 PUREFOY Malik D D V D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
111 HANNER Robert D D D D D V D 0.6 1 +0.4
113 PIERCE Chandon D D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
114 ATON Dave D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
115 SCHLEY Nancy D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
116 RAMIREZ Michael D D D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
116 SAFRAN Isaac D D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3
118 AUTREY Blaine D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
119 PIPER Maggie D D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
120 HUNTER James D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
121 CARVER David D D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
121 GURRAM Srirugneth D D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.