16th Annual Yellow Jacket Open

Div III Mixed Épée

Sunday, March 1, 2026 at 3:00 PM

Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 MUNAGAPATI Vishwa - 2% 9% 26% 36% 23% 4%
2 SCORDINSKY Liam 1% 12% 35% 36% 14% 2%
3 KIM Daniel - - - - 2% 24% 74%
3 KNOX Aidan - - 3% 23% 56% 18%
5 SORANNO James - - 1% 11% 42% 46%
6 CARRIE Konnor - - - - 5% 31% 63%
7 DIEKER Edwin - 10% 31% 36% 19% 4% -
8 IBANEZ Julien - - 3% 13% 31% 37% 17%
9 PANTALONE giuseppe A. - - - 4% 33% 63%
10 ERIZE Alejandro 1% 5% 18% 33% 30% 12% 2%
11 HUSZAR Sara - 2% 12% 29% 35% 19% 3%
12 JIANG Harry - 2% 12% 31% 35% 18% 3%
13 KARRIEM Zainuddin - 1% 9% 31% 42% 15% 1%
14 WRIGHT Alex - 1% 8% 29% 42% 20%
15 ASLANER Eren - 2% 15% 38% 33% 11% 1%
16 KERTESZ Stefan G. - < 1% 2% 14% 37% 38% 10%
17 SOARES Manuel - 1% 8% 27% 41% 23%
18 RAGLAND Ben 1% 7% 25% 36% 23% 6% 1%
19 CHEN Andrew - - 3% 16% 34% 34% 13%
20 BONILHA-VAN'T HOF Rafael - - 4% 19% 37% 31% 9%
21 SIGG Noah - - 3% 28% 49% 18% 1%
22 PUREFOY Malik - 2% 11% 26% 33% 22% 6%
23 HUGHES Eric - - 1% 7% 24% 41% 27%
25 CARNEY Landon - - 2% 13% 40% 42% 3%
26 WYNN Paul - 1% 5% 20% 37% 30% 8%
27 XHEMALI Nathan - - 4% 20% 41% 29% 6%
28 HUNTER James - 8% 31% 38% 19% 4% -
29 SUN Yuzheng - 5% 21% 38% 29% 8%
30 BATISTA Julian - 4% 14% 29% 32% 17% 4%
31 KINSELLA John - - 3% 14% 32% 35% 15%
32 FERRARO Nicholas 1% 7% 22% 33% 26% 10% 1%
33 QUINTIN Guillaume - - 2% 11% 28% 38% 20%
34 HUA Daniel - 3% 12% 27% 33% 20% 5%
35 HANNER Robert - 6% 31% 45% 16% 2%
36 GRANT Grayson 3% 15% 33% 32% 15% 2% -
37 SOU Barry - 3% 13% 30% 33% 17% 3%
38 ANGADI Shreyas - 1% 5% 19% 36% 30% 9%
39 PONDER Alfred - - 3% 14% 31% 35% 16%
40 KARPF Jonah - 1% 7% 21% 34% 28% 9%
41 WAGNER Cosette - 1% 12% 32% 35% 17% 3%
42 GEISSLER Maximilian - 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3%
43 BEDULLA Asher - 1% 5% 21% 37% 29% 8%
44 MENON Rahul 3% 19% 36% 29% 11% 2% -
45 MENDEZ SILVA Matias - 1% 15% 42% 33% 8% -
46 BARRETT John 10% 35% 38% 15% 2% -
47 GUNDUBOGULA Shrihan 1% 11% 33% 35% 16% 3% -
48 LAND John 5% 27% 38% 22% 6% 1% -
49 PHILLIPS Carson 8% 32% 37% 18% 4% - -
50 CUPO Anthony - 3% 14% 30% 33% 17% 3%
51 SONG Apolo 1% 6% 19% 32% 28% 13% 2%
52 SIGGINS Wally 4% 19% 34% 28% 12% 3% -
53 HAWKINS Sophia 9% 29% 34% 20% 6% 1% -
54 GARG Shiv 14% 35% 32% 15% 4% - -
55 AGUILLON Alexis 1% 14% 33% 33% 16% 4% -
55 CHAPPELL Wesley 16% 40% 33% 10% 1% -
57 MESNER Talyn 14% 51% 30% 5% - - -
58 TUCKER Evan - 3% 14% 32% 33% 15% 2%
59 HORN Luane 1% 14% 37% 35% 12% 1%
60 PEACOCK Audrey 22% 39% 27% 10% 2% - -
61 HOUSMANS Emma 22% 43% 27% 7% 1% - -
62 MURO Ryan - 4% 16% 33% 32% 14% 2%
63 TAMILSELVAN Anjali 6% 27% 37% 22% 6% 1% -
64 CARVER David 4% 24% 40% 25% 7% 1%
65 ATON Dave - 1% 11% 39% 38% 11%
66 LE BLANC Anna 19% 42% 30% 8% 1% - -
67 BANJA Michael 4% 23% 42% 27% 4% -
68 SEATON Jake 3% 21% 42% 29% 5% -
69 HARRIS Flynn - 3% 19% 45% 30% 3%
70 CLOPPER Meredith 1% 11% 31% 36% 18% 2%
71 LEE Eunjae 5% 19% 32% 28% 13% 3% -
72 HICKS Joseph 2% 13% 28% 31% 19% 6% 1%
73 SUMMEY Travis 3% 26% 41% 24% 6% -
74 KIM Junseong - 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 6%
75 GEURTSEN Henry 33% 41% 20% 5% 1% - -
76 RAFFERTY Catherine 1% 8% 28% 37% 21% 5% -
77 KAWALE Rachita 6% 33% 39% 18% 3% -
78 AUTREY Blaine 2% 29% 40% 22% 6% 1% -
79 BEST Sydney 4% 22% 37% 26% 9% 1% -
80 ABEL Nathanael 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3% -
81 SOKOLOWSKI Olivia 22% 42% 27% 8% 1% - -
82 MYINT Andy Soe 1% 5% 20% 36% 29% 9% -
83 GEURTSEN Oliver 6% 44% 46% 4% - -
84 PIPER Maggie 57% 34% 8% 1% - -
85 SCHLEY Nancy 46% 39% 13% 2% - -
86 SEARS SARAH 14% 46% 38% 2% - - -
87 YAO Sophia 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
89 VARNER Kathryn 11% 57% 29% 3% - - -
90 SAFRAN Isaac 53% 37% 9% 1% - - -
91 CHO Mike Sungjun 32% 45% 20% 3% - -
92 HAHN Rebecca 19% 40% 30% 10% 2% - -
93 GURRAM Srirugneth 11% 32% 35% 18% 4% - -
94 ROBERTS Ransom 1% 8% 29% 39% 20% 3%
95 KARRIEM Veronica 23% 58% 17% 2% - - -
96 JOSHI Zara 6% 24% 35% 25% 9% 2% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.