Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MUNAGAPATI Vishwa | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 2 | SCORDINSKY Liam | V D V V V | V V V V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 3 | KIM Daniel | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
| 3 | KNOX Aidan | V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 5 | SORANNO James | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 6 | CARRIE Konnor | V D V V D V | V V V D | 5.6 | 4 | -1.6 |
| 7 | DIEKER Edwin | D V V D V V | V V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 8 | IBANEZ Julien | V D V V V D | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 9 | PANTALONE giuseppe A. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 10 | ERIZE Alejandro | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 11 | HUSZAR Sara | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 12 | JIANG Harry | V D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 13 | KARRIEM Zainuddin | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 14 | WRIGHT Alex | D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 15 | ASLANER Eren | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 16 | KERTESZ Stefan G. | D D D D D V | V V V D | 4.4 | 1 | -3.4 |
| 17 | SOARES Manuel | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 18 | RAGLAND Ben | V V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 6 | +3.0 |
| 19 | CHEN Andrew | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 20 | BONILHA-VAN'T HOF Rafael | V V V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 21 | SIGG Noah | V V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 22 | PUREFOY Malik | V D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 23 | HUGHES Eric | V D D V V V | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 25 | CARNEY Landon | D V V D V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 26 | WYNN Paul | V D V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 27 | XHEMALI Nathan | V V V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 28 | HUNTER James | V V V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 29 | SUN Yuzheng | D V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 30 | BATISTA Julian | V V D D D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 31 | KINSELLA John | D D D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 32 | FERRARO Nicholas | D V V D D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 33 | QUINTIN Guillaume | V V V V V D | D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 34 | HUA Daniel | D V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 35 | HANNER Robert | V V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 36 | GRANT Grayson | V V V D V D | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 37 | SOU Barry | D V V V D V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 38 | ANGADI Shreyas | V V D V D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 39 | PONDER Alfred | D V V V V D | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 40 | KARPF Jonah | V V D D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 41 | WAGNER Cosette | V D V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 42 | GEISSLER Maximilian | D V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 43 | BEDULLA Asher | V D D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 44 | MENON Rahul | V V D D V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 | |
| 45 | MENDEZ SILVA Matias | D V D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 46 | BARRETT John | V D D V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 47 | GUNDUBOGULA Shrihan | D V V D D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 48 | LAND John | D D D V V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 49 | PHILLIPS Carson | D V D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 50 | CUPO Anthony | D V V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 51 | SONG Apolo | V D V D D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 52 | SIGGINS Wally | D V D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 53 | HAWKINS Sophia | V D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 54 | GARG Shiv | D D V V D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 55 | AGUILLON Alexis | V D D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 55 | CHAPPELL Wesley | V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 57 | MESNER Talyn | D D V D V D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 58 | TUCKER Evan | D D D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 59 | HORN Luane | D D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 60 | PEACOCK Audrey | V D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 61 | HOUSMANS Emma | D D V D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 62 | MURO Ryan | D D V D D D | V D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 63 | TAMILSELVAN Anjali | D D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 64 | CARVER David | D D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 65 | ATON Dave | V V D V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 66 | LE BLANC Anna | V D V V D D | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 67 | BANJA Michael | D D V D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 68 | SEATON Jake | D V V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 69 | HARRIS Flynn | V V D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 70 | CLOPPER Meredith | D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 71 | LEE Eunjae | D D V D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 72 | HICKS Joseph | D V V D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 73 | SUMMEY Travis | V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 74 | KIM Junseong | D V D V D D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 75 | GEURTSEN Henry | V D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 76 | RAFFERTY Catherine | V D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 77 | KAWALE Rachita | V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 78 | AUTREY Blaine | D V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 79 | BEST Sydney | D V D D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 80 | ABEL Nathanael | D V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 81 | SOKOLOWSKI Olivia | V V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 82 | MYINT Andy Soe | D D D V V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 83 | GEURTSEN Oliver | D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 84 | PIPER Maggie | D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 85 | SCHLEY Nancy | D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 86 | SEARS SARAH | V D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 87 | YAO Sophia | D D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 89 | VARNER Kathryn | D D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 90 | SAFRAN Isaac | V D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 91 | CHO Mike Sungjun | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 92 | HAHN Rebecca | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 93 | GURRAM Srirugneth | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 94 | ROBERTS Ransom | D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
| 95 | KARRIEM Veronica | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 96 | JOSHI Zara | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.