Magic City RJCC/RYC

Junior Men’s Foil (JNRMF)

Saturday, March 12, 2022 at 11:30 AM

Register

Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3592 3870 - 3347
5 - 8 2977 3147 - 2766
9 - 16 2367 2760 - 2115
17 - 24 1743 2105 - 1383

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Xiao, Enoch Birmingham Fencing Club A22 3870 3602.30
2 Xiao, Ethan Birmingham Fencing Club A21 3717 3451.54
3 Zhang, Andy Epic Fencing Club A21 3435 3176.81
4 Mitchell, Philip Birmingham Fencing Club B22 3347 3078.67
5 Tang, Owen Epic Fencing Club B22 3147 2893.97
6 Song, Leonardo Epic Fencing Club A21 3124 2867.11
7 Wong, Garrick Birmingham Fencing Club B21 2872 2611.87
8 Gatza, Logan Elite Fencing Academy (GA) B21 2766 2489.60
9 Williams, Connor Bluegrass Fencers' Club C21 2760 2487.13
10 Love, Aaron Epic Fencing Club C22 2723 2454.02
11 Zhao, Dylan Birmingham Fencing Club D21 2515 2078.69
12 Wang, Brayden Birmingham Fencing Club E22 2287 2009.11
13 Ross, Paul Birmingham Fencing Club D21 2215 1879.50
14 Fan, Yuchen Epic Fencing Club U 2169 1857.66
15 Zou, Yuming Birmingham Fencing Club E21 2115 1787.60
16 Hearn, Christen Birmingham Fencing Club E21 2151 1763.52
17 Ammon, Blue Birmingham Fencing Club E19 2105 1704.32
18 Chen, Leetyan Space City Fencing Academy U 1939 1609.65
19 Mitchell, Henry Nashville Academy of Fencing U 1993 1488.13
20 Thiyagarajaa, Ari Memphis University School Fencing Team U 1762 1382.30
21 Exnicios, Rex New Orleans Fencers Club U 1586 1147.08
22 Chakravarty, Amrik Memphis University School Fencing Team U 1383 427.84
23 Li, Alex Epic Fencing Club U 1783 < 0
24 Osborne, Jordan Mississippi Fencing Club U 1392 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!