Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HARTMARK Anders | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% | |
| 2 | GÉLINAS Jonathan | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 3 | LIMA Kevin M. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 3 | LEE Joshua | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 5 | LOPEZ Carlos D. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% | |
| 6 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 50% | 19% | |
| 7 | DIVENTI Paul W. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
| 8 | GU Jeffrey | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 9 | WANG Christopher M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 10 | VITI Mark G. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 53% | |
| 11 | RITCHIE Luke W. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 12 | LIU Eric P. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 13 | SMITH V Edward (Quin) A. | - | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 14 | SHI Shenzhi | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 44% | 14% | |
| 15 | KEE Andrew L. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 16 | RINEHART Conner M. | - | 3% | 22% | 45% | 26% | 4% | |
| 17 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 18 | TIAN Aaron C. | - | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | FOTENOS Noah T. | 8% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | BEALE Asa G. | 11% | 41% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | KIZHNER Fillip | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | MILLER Andrew | 6% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | WHITEHEAD Amir | 3% | 30% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | ALONSOZANA Luke | 1% | 10% | 35% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 25 | SNIVELY Mark C. | 17% | 50% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 26 | ROSSEN Michael | 11% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | HILGENBERG Kyle | 7% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | O'CONNOR Kristian | 23% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 29 | MAHNKEN Thomas P. | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 30 | ROZENTAL Robert | 56% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | MURCH Leo | 62% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.