March NAC

Y-14 Women's Foil

Monday, March 9, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Huntington Convention Center of Cleveland - Cleveland, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LIU Enjia Sherry liu 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 80%
2 DUAN Sophie 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 62%
3 MCSHERRY Kayla 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 75%
3 BROWN Lola 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 69%
5 BING Charlotte 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 69%
6 TAO Ann 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 73% 25%
7 ORRINGER Lottie 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 47%
8 GONG Hai 100% 100% 100% 97% 72% 18%
9 KRAHE Annika 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 56%
10 HSIAO Ariya 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 38%
11 WANG DINA C. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 62%
12 LI Joy 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 47%
13 LIU Qianchen E. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 72%
14 CAO Amelie 100% 100% 100% 96% 55%
15 HUANG Natalie 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 66% 20%
17 WATSON Evelyn 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 75% 33%
18 CULLIVAN Sienna 100% 100% 100% 94% 64% 19%
19 TSIMIKLIS aphrodite 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 54%
20 LIU Ariana 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 62%
21 HAN Gian 100% 100% 100% 91% 63% 25% 4%
22 CHAN Mila 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 63% 18%
23 HOROWITZ Shuli 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 61%
24 WANG Amabel 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 62%
25 KIM Natalie 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 39% 4%
26 ZHOU Joi 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 25%
26 ZHAO Olivia 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 52%
28 KENSICKI Phoebe 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 26%
29 ZHU Ella 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 13%
30 LI Alice 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 51%
31 YAO Abby 100% 100% 100% 97% 77% 33%
32 TELEB Farida 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 35% 4%
33 KIM Sydney 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 77%
33 MCFARLANE Asha 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 67%
35 SAIFEE Zahra 100% 100% 96% 76% 37% 8% 1%
36 MURPHY Genevieve 100% 100% 99% 95% 77% 41% 9%
37 DHALIWAL Seerat 100% 100% 98% 89% 60% 23% 2%
38 SHIN Elizabeth 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 69% 23%
39 JIANG Chloe 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 74% 29%
40 DESAI Zoya 100% 95% 72% 34% 8% -
41 MUMMANENI Samyuta 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 37%
42 JENA Aanvi 100% 100% 94% 69% 31% 6% -
43 JOO Sara 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 26%
44 LAI Miranda 100% 100% 95% 76% 38% 8%
45 PARK Zena 100% 100% 100% 93% 61% 18%
46 XING Melly 100% 100% 98% 84% 45% 5%
47 LIU Ashley 100% 100% 99% 92% 64% 21%
48 ROBERTS Anastasia 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 27%
49 BOIKE Lucille 100% 100% 100% 99% 85% 44% 9%
50 ZHENG Annalyn 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 23% 4%
51 DENG Gaowa Eva 100% 100% 99% 91% 59% 18% 2%
52 HOM Avery 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 21% 2%
53 ZHANG Viviana 100% 100% 99% 90% 59% 19% 2%
54 MALIK Manha 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 31% 6%
55 SON Ayoung 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 41% 5%
56 LI savannah 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 67% 16%
57 ZEE Savannah 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 29% 4%
58 WU Gloria 100% 98% 86% 57% 23% 4% -
59 MAGALLANES GABRIELA 100% 100% 100% 92% 35%
60 DE CASTRO Kai 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 17%
61 LEE Abigail 100% 99% 87% 57% 23% 4% -
62 ZHANG Lian 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 75% 30%
63 KIM Audrey 100% 79% 38% 10% 1% - -
64 ZHANG Caroline 100% 80% 40% 11% 1% -
65 HU Sophie 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 31%
66 LU Keeva 100% 100% 94% 70% 29% 5%
67 CHUNG Katie 100% 99% 91% 64% 28% 6% < 1%
68 NWODO Naila 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 45% 9%
69 DAI Iris Yuyang 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 55% 11%
70 EYER Brooke 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 28%
71 SAIFEE Sakina 100% 97% 83% 51% 18% 3% -
72 HAN Mia 100% 100% 100% 94% 72% 34% 7%
73 FRASER Morgan 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 34% 7%
74 ESAKI Kei 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 15%
75 YARBILOVA Aya 100% 97% 82% 47% 15% 2% -
76 KNAPP Isabella 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 14%
77 WU Maggie Lei 100% 100% 99% 90% 57% 15%
78 JIN Jada Y 100% 100% 95% 73% 35% 7%
79 SALMI-BYDALEK Ada 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 27% 4%
80 CHANG Lydia 100% 100% 100% 93% 66% 27% 5%
80 HO Peyton 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 22% 3%
82 LI Annabelle 100% 100% 93% 62% 24% 4% -
83 DUVVA Sanika 100% 98% 86% 54% 19% 3%
84 JOESUF Thea 100% 98% 80% 45% 15% 2% -
84 JIANG Ziqing 100% 100% 100% 93% 59% 17% 1%
86 DING Jennifer 100% 97% 77% 39% 9% 1% -
87 WEN Cynthia 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 19% 3%
88 ELLISON Ingrid 100% 91% 61% 24% 4% -
89 FAN Sophia 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 22% 3%
90 ZHANG Hannah 100% 100% 98% 83% 47% 10% 1%
91 NEUMANN Erika 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 17%
92 PECK Madeleine 100% 100% 99% 86% 52% 16% 2%
93 SHEN Gloria 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 20% 1%
94 YANG Hanli 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 35% 7%
94 BALIN Julia 100% 100% 95% 79% 46% 15% 2%
96 YANG Olivia 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 13% 1%
97 WANG Doreen 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 30% 5%
98 CHAN Ella 100% 100% 100% 93% 62% 18%
99 SHAOOLIAN Maya 100% 100% 99% 93% 63% 10%
100 FU Joy 100% 96% 72% 30% 4% -
101 KIM Ines 100% 96% 72% 31% 5% -
102 DONG Iris 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 43% 6%
103 ZHU Alivia 100% 100% 96% 72% 21% 2%
104 SMOLICH Emily 100% 100% 97% 80% 38% 8% 1%
105 LUO lucy 100% 100% 100% 93% 68% 26% 2%
106 ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla 100% 100% 98% 83% 49% 15% 2%
107 LIU Anya 100% 98% 86% 57% 23% 5% -
108 BO Iris 100% 100% 99% 89% 46% 11% 1%
108 ZHANG Queeny 100% 100% 97% 78% 42% 11% 1%
108 PARK Hannah 100% 99% 90% 62% 25% 5% -
111 SUN Nicole 100% 97% 80% 44% 13% 1%
112 GOWDA Siyona 100% 96% 66% 19% 2% -
113 HUANG Emma 100% 97% 81% 46% 15% 2% -
115 GUO Jianing 100% 66% 19% 3% - - -
116 ZHANG Selina 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 16% 2%
117 XU-FERGUSON Victoria 100% 99% 86% 47% 11% -
118 KIM Yuna 100% 94% 64% 25% 5% -
119 MA Sophia 100% 98% 86% 53% 19% 3% -
120 FENG Claire 100% 97% 80% 44% 14% 2% -
121 WU Charlotte 100% 94% 61% 21% 4% - -
123 LI Sophia 100% 98% 83% 45% 12% 1% -
124 ARYA Leela 100% 99% 91% 65% 28% 6% -
125 FU Pui Lam (Paisley) 100% 98% 86% 55% 20% 3% -
126 DENG Claire 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 22% 3%
127 HUANG Gabrielle 100% 75% 31% 7% 1% -
128 KIM Lauren 100% 99% 82% 41% 8% -
129 LAVERY Lucy 100% 100% 91% 61% 24% 5% -
130 CHEN Summer 100% 99% 91% 66% 30% 7% -
131 MIYOSHI Kylie 100% 100% 99% 94% 75% 37% 6%
132 RIVERA Leahy 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 32% 6%
133 LEE Zoe E. 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 20% 2%
134 CHO Karis 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 18% 2%
135 TAO Isabella 100% 98% 83% 47% 13% 1%
136 YUNG Zoe 100% 96% 63% 21% 3% -
137 BYK Karalina 100% 100% 100% 94% 71% 31% 4%
138 CHAN Jolene 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 39% 7%
138 HAYLETT Emily 100% 100% 95% 66% 21% 3% -
140 CHENG Audrey 100% 100% 99% 93% 60% 18% 2%
141 KLIVANS Gwyneth 100% 84% 40% 9% 1% - -
142 SFINTESCU Emma 100% 99% 94% 71% 32% 4%
143 ETIKALA Saanvi 100% 99% 93% 66% 28% 5% -
144 TEWARI Amaira 100% 100% 96% 74% 34% 7% -
145 KUANG Bella 100% 100% 98% 79% 37% 8% 1%
146 KHETPAL Aalia 100% 100% 95% 73% 34% 7% -
147 WANG Allyson 100% 94% 45% 10% 1% - -
148 HUANG Rosalyn 100% 93% 67% 31% 8% 1% -
149 LIU Sophia 100% 93% 67% 30% 7% 1% -
150 TIAN Claire 100% 91% 49% 8% 1% - -
151 HSU Rachel 100% 97% 79% 41% 11% 1%
152 HOM Emma 100% 98% 83% 44% 11% 1%
153 IWERSEN Marte 100% 100% 97% 55% 15% 1%
154 LI Doreen 100% 99% 87% 44% 9% 1% -
155 ZHANG Priscilla 100% 100% 96% 74% 37% 9% 1%
156 MCLANAHAN Jasmine 100% 100% 90% 51% 14% 2% -
157 JAZWINSKI Ivy 100% 95% 73% 37% 11% 1% -
158 SHUI Zola 100% 87% 52% 18% 3% - -
159 BELL Blake 100% 99% 85% 48% 14% 2% -
160 HEWITT Madison 100% 81% 42% 13% 2% - -
161 HAFEZ Sahar 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 20% 3%
162 DONG Katelyn 100% 100% 91% 61% 23% 4% -
163 CULLIVAN Elise 100% 95% 67% 27% 5% - -
164 BAULIN Zoya 100% 100% 90% 55% 18% 3% -
165 LI Audrey 100% 82% 42% 12% 2% -
166 THOTA Akira 100% 97% 79% 43% 11% 1%
167 SAVIOZ Naomi 100% 94% 69% 33% 9% 1% -
168 LIN Avery 100% 97% 79% 46% 16% 3% -
169 FAN Lauren 100% 89% 25% 3% - - -
170 LIN Claire 100% 100% 95% 62% 23% 4% -
171 FAN Melody 100% 92% 53% 17% 3% - -
172 LIU Doris-Zihan Zhou 100% 96% 63% 23% 4% - -
173 MCCLAIN Madison 100% 89% 53% 18% 3% - -
174 TANG Clementine 100% 81% 36% 6% - - -
175 SAMALA Reese 100% 99% 88% 60% 25% 5% -
176 BRADSHAW Tamira 100% 92% 60% 24% 5% - -
177 KIM Lael 100% 93% 58% 17% 2% - -
178 QIAO Lori-Ann 100% 78% 36% 9% 1% -
179 DEJOY Leilah 100% 95% 46% 4% -
180 VALOUEVA Katerina 100% 61% 17% 2% - -
181 CHUNG Stella 100% 98% 84% 50% 16% 2%
182 LEE Clara 100% 18% 1% - -
183 ZHANG Annabelle 100% 81% 7% - - -
184 ARCE BASURCO Juliana 100% 52% 13% 1% - -
185 UTIN Alexandra 100% 97% 56% 6% -
186 DONG Audrey 100% 79% 36% 9% 1% -
187 EPSTEIN Naomi 100% 100% 97% 80% 47% 15% 2%
188 DONG Nancy 100% 62% 20% 3% - - -
189 LU Chloe 100% 97% 72% 31% 7% 1% -
190 ZHAN Catherine 100% 89% 42% 7% - -
191 CHAN Hailey 100% 83% 46% 15% 3% - -
192 FERRARI Ande 100% 45% 10% 1% - - -
193 YIN Emily 100% 94% 61% 19% 3% - -
194 CHAN Kaitlyn 100% 95% 75% 40% 12% 2% -
195 GONG Maggie 100% 59% 16% 2% - - -
196 YOUN Davina 100% 65% 22% 4% - - -
197 ALEKSANDROVA Mira 100% 38% 5% - - -
197 FENG Sophia 100% 41% 6% - - - -
199 LIU Bella 100% 89% 57% 22% 4% - -
200 BHANGOO Paloma 100% 88% 51% 17% 3% - -
201 ZHU Alicia 100% 50% 12% 1% - - -
201 SHIPMAN Danika 100% 42% 6% - - - -
203 KRISHNAN Maya 100% 92% 37% 6% - - -
204 JOHNSON Elizabeth 100% 65% 15% 1% - - -
204 KUMAR Leela 100% 76% 29% 3% - - -
206 MACKINTOSH Quinn 100% 99% 92% 68% 32% 7% -
207 SMART Athena 100% 84% 47% 15% 3% - -
208 LIU Jocelyn 100% 30% 4% - - -
209 YUEN Hannah 100% 22% - - - -
210 LAM Dorris Yandor 100% 99% 85% 50% 15% 1% -
212 CHEN Yinuo 100% 95% 67% 25% 3% -
213 SHAOOLIAN Alexa 100% 91% 61% 25% 6% 1% -
213 BENTLEY Amelia 100% 55% 13% 1% - - -
215 JOESUF Aurielle 100% 57% 16% 2% - -
216 FAROOQI Eliora 100% 86% 52% 19% 4% - -
216 CHAN Chloe 100% 91% 47% 7% - - -
218 TATINENI Charvi 100% 61% 19% 3% - - -
218 ZHANG Katie Q. 100% 83% 38% 9% 1% - -
218 TEPLOVA Elizabeth 100% 81% 36% 5% - - -
218 D'MELLO Ariella 100% 84% 35% 7% 1% - -
222 LALONDE Beatrice 100% 79% 32% 6% 1% -
223 ZHOU Jennifer 100% 18% 1% - - - -
224 LIU Doris 100% 18% 1% - - - -
225 CHO Yuna 100% 43% 7% - - - -
225 BADER Mia 100% 37% 6% - - - -
225 KERR Ingrid 100% 61% 13% 1% - - -
228 MILLER Sydney 100% 33% 4% - - - -
228 TANG Ming-Hao (Audrey) 100% 27% 3% - - - -
230 ZELDIN Nina 100% 68% 21% 3% - - -
231 SHIN Ellie 100% 17% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.