MSA Sports Spot - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LU Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 2 | LIN Jun Hui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% |
| 3 | LATORRE Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
| 3 | EDWARDS Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 5 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 6 | COOK Grant | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 10% | |
| 7 | ZHAO Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 8 | WENGER Liam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 15% | 1% |
| 9 | TEH DJ Missing ID | |||||||
| 10 | WANG Kevin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 1% |
| 11 | PAYNE Lynas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | 2% |
| 12 | ZMUDA Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 8% |
| 13 | WENGER Rowan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 1% |
| 14 | LI Andy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% | ||
| 15 | RITTER Nathan D. | 100% | 93% | 51% | 12% | 1% | ||
| 16 | MCCONKEY Tristan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
| 17 | LINEBERRY CADEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 7% |
| 18 | MORGAN Jacob | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 19 | TAGORE Ayansh | 100% | 97% | 72% | 26% | 3% | ||
| 20 | MORALES Tycho | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 21 | CRONK Trevor | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | DEPP Edward | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 8% | - |
| 23 | XU Rambert | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 24 | GOGOI Kavi | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 25 | STAMPS Jasper | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 25 | WANG Freyr | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 27 | DENG Albert | 100% | 89% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | VOGEL Rylan | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 29 | CHAN William | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | KOLACKI Gabriel | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | MEI Edan | 100% | 88% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | GU Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 33 | THEKKEL Jonathan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | MCGRATH Milo | 100% | 100% | 91% | 57% | 12% | ||
| 35 | BEDARD Bennett | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 36 | CHASE Crosby | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | MARVEL Elliot | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 38 | CORDERO Lucas | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | ||
| 39 | VUTUKURI Nikhil Missing ID | |||||||
| 40 | MATIYASH Andrew | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | SPAULDING Oliver | 100% | 99% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.