MSA Sports Spot - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 | CHOI JULIE | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
| 3 | HOOGSTRA Lucy | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
| 3 | HUANG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 5 | TAN Dorathy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% | |
| 6 | HOROWITZ Shuli | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | |
| 7 | BOIKE Lucille | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 9% |
| 8 | WEN Cynthia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 9 | HARRIS Parker | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
| 10 | AADHI Hansika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% |
| 11 | CULLIVAN Sienna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% | |
| 12 | YU Angela | 100% | 90% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 13 | ZHANG Priscilla | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 8% | - |
| 14 | COLLINS Anna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 26% | 3% | |
| 15 | MORSE Katherine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | - |
| 16 | LIN Kenzie | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
| 17 | SWOPE Farren | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 18 | NAFSOU Ava | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 19 | SAMALA Reese | 100% | 99% | 84% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
| 20 | SONG Jenna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 21 | BLAKEY Heaven | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 15% | - |
| 22 | SUN Nicole | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 23 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 24 | XIONG Isabel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
| 25 | ADLER Zoe | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | WOERTER Therese-Margaret | 100% | 88% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | LICHTENSTEIGER Megan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 28 | TAYLOR-OSBORN Nadia | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | NEPAL Asha | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 30 | LIN Aria | 100% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 31 | REDEMANN Reagan | 100% | 72% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | KANG Marian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 11% | |
| 33 | PARANJAPE Ojasvi | 100% | 87% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | LEVY Gabrielle | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | CHANDLER Annika | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | VINS Katherine | 100% | 85% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | ARSOVSKI Maya | 100% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | CHANDLER Camille | 100% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.