Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MOSLEY Wally | V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | SAMOYLOV Daniel | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | WONG Kyle | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 3 | YOON Ian | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 5 | LIN Logan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 6 | WU Nathan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 7 | GUO Jonathan | V V V D V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 8 | YOO Lucas | V D V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 9 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 10 | CHU Clayton | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 11 | SUN Jerry | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 12 | LI Stephen | V V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 13 | FONG Ethan | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 14 | LEE Lucas | D V V V V D | V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
| 15 | LIU Yihong | V V D D V V | V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 16 | ZHAO Luke | V D V D D | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 17 | FU Benjamin | V D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 18 | YI Alexander | V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 19 | ELARDO Griffin | V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 20 | TIAN Dylan | V D V V D V | D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 21 | YUN Mason | V V D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 22 | HAN Alex | V V V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 23 | NOVOSELOV Roman | V D V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 24 | PARK Sean | V D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 25 | LI John | D V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 26 | LIU William | V D D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 27 | GONG Rongtao | V D V D V D | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 28 | LO Stefan | D V V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 29 | TENG Eric | V D V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 30 | WANG Alexander | V V V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 31 | NGUYEN Norris | D D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 32 | ZHANG Jenson | D D D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 33 | JIN JETFAN | V D V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 34 | KOU Logan | V V D D V V | D | 1.3 | 4 | +2.7 |
| 35 | DUCOURNAU Enzo | D V D V V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 36 | REN Mark | D D V V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 37 | XUE Jason | V V V D D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 38 | HONG Eason | V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 39 | LIU Aiden | D V D V D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 40 | NOZAWA Luke | V D V D V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 41 | GUO OSCAR | V D V D D V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 42 | KIM Benjamin | D V V V D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 43 | BALDWIN Liam | V V D D V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 44 | SI Alexander | D V V D V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 45 | DOLEZAL Grayson | D D V D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 47 | LI Ethan | D V D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 48 | WAN William | D V D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 49 | BUSH Andrew | D V V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 50 | LI Connor | V D V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 51 | MCEWEN Max | D V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 52 | KONG Dean | D D V D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 53 | CHO Lincoln | V D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 54 | NISHIOKA Hiro | D V D V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 55 | TOTH Leland | D V D V D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 56 | YE Andrew | D V D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 57 | HAO Hardy | D V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 58 | DING Daniel | D D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 59 | CHO Nathan | D D D V D D | V D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 60 | SHI Ethan | D V D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 61 | EVANS Harvey | D D D V D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 62 | LI nathan zeting | D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 63 | LEE Connor | D D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 64 | JAFARINEJAD Sam | D D D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
| 65 | LEE Paxton | D D D V D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 66 | YANG Rony | V D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 67 | CHANG Ephram | D D D D D V | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 68 | YANG Mikey | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 69 | DAI Greyson | D D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 70 | DEMIRCHIAN Edward | D D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 71 | LEI Hanson | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 72 | LU Mark | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 73 | LI Anson | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 74 | LEE Zeo | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.