Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Zoe | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
| 2 | XU Yvette | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 51% |
| 3 | ELSTON Sophie | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 3 | WANG Ziqi (yoyo) | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 57% |
| 5 | BUSH emma | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 6 | SUN Karolyn | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 7 | MOLLINIER Angel | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 3% |
| 8 | WANG Jessie | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 24% | |
| 9 | XU Amy | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 10 | CAMAMA Tessa | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 11 | XU Serena | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% | |
| 12 | WU Jessica | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 42% | 29% | |
| 13 | XU Jessica | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
| 14 | SHETTY Nandita | 2% | 17% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 15 | XU Celina | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 32% | 4% |
| 16 | LI Yunxuan (Joy) | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 17 | LI Azalea | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 18 | RADOV Una | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 19 | MAI Mailan | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
| 20 | YUNG Bethany | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | ARULKUMAR Lashia | 2% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 22 | SUN Hanya | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% | |
| 23 | HERNASA Anna | - | - | 7% | 30% | 45% | 18% | |
| 24 | MENDOZA zoie | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% | |
| 25 | HANKINS Morgan | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 60% |
| 26 | BURICEA Ada | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 27 | IYER Ishana | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 27 | GIERAT-KATZ Izabella | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 1% |
| 29 | LEE Yeriel | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 30 | WANG Emily | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 31 | BALAKRISHNAN Trisha | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 34% | |
| 32 | GARCIA Sophia Noelle | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | KANE Chloe | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 34 | CHEONG Chloe | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 35 | JAQUISH Zoey | 3% | 20% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | SCHOR Elisabeth | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 37 | DYMAR Anna | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 38 | HERD Angela | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | CHUNG Penelope | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
| 40 | BLAETZ Isadora | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | FENG Iris | - | 5% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 42 | BUDMAN Ava | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 43 | XU Emily (Hua) | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 44 | KIM Vivian | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 45 | MENG Fina | 2% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 46 | YIP Allison | 3% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 47 | BROWN Riley | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 29% | 6% | |
| 47 | ZU Jacqueline | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 49 | LIN Laura | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 50 | CHO Jacey | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 51 | TESLENKO Ekaterina | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | CHO Anya | 3% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 53 | GAGARING Genia | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 54 | ZHU Riley | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 55 | LEE Adelynn | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 56 | LE Luana | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | KOHLER Chrissy | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | SHERMAN Olivia | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 59 | YUMIACO Nylah | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 60 | RAPTIS Layla | 28% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 61 | OSBORNE Guadalupe | 30% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 62 | FANG Olivia | 21% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | LI Wan-Tao | 61% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 64 | THOMAS Mackenzie | 46% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 65 | MADANNAVAR Trisha | 21% | 49% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 66 | LU Chloe | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 67 | LAMOREAUX Savannah | 24% | 46% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | HATHAWAY Alesya | 34% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 69 | LINARES Chantal | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 70 | UEMURA Lyllia | 24% | 45% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | LUCENA Yaretzi | 50% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 72 | KENNEDY Skyler | 33% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 73 | OSBORNE Maria | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.