Maplewood, NJ - Maplewood, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEIGH David A. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
2 | PAOLINI Nathan R. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 34% | |
3 | MARKHAM Jimmy | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
3 | KIM Juni C. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 45% | 28% | |
5 | KOKENGE Clark | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
6 | STOTT Donovan R. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
7 | BAKER Kevin G. | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
8 | MARCHANT Albert J. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
9 | POLKOVSKY Dylan S. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
10 | WOLF Myles J. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
11 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 4% | |
12 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
13 | SPANO Gideon S. | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
14 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
15 | MORSE Tyler | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
16 | DOLMETSCH Max | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
17 | SLAVINSKIY Alan | - | - | 5% | 23% | 46% | 26% | |
18 | SHENG Patrick Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
19 | BURNHAM Charlie E. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
20 | BORATIN Daniel I. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
20 | BEKKER Mitchel | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
22 | ZHANG Matthew | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
23 | ZARETSKY Daniel A. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
24 | CHA Russell W. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
25 | KUMAR Anitya | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
26 | ZHENG Hagen | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
27 | RODELL Hunter C. | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | |
28 | MALENFANT Vincent | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
29 | BONIN Jr. Christopher J. | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
30 | STADNIKOV Tom | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
31 | ELAMURUGAN Kavin | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
32 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
33 | SINGH Laekhram | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
34 | SIDDIQUI Humza K. | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
35 | PLECHAVICIUS Daniel | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
36 | GIBSON Nowell L. | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
37 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
38 | CONNELLY Asa D. | 14% | 46% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
39 | LEE Tae Hee | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
40 | BEYRICH Henry J. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
41 | CHAUDHRY Rafay | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
42 | SHINE Peter C. | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - | |
43 | JACKSON Anthony I. | 19% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
44 | MATINHO Jameson | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.