Atlantic City Convention Center - Hall D - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SINGLETON Aman | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
| 2 | LUO Alexander | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 3 | FONG Kobe | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 3 | TUNG Charlie | - | - | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% | |
| 5 | CHO Adrian | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% |
| 6 | ZHOU Zhi Matthew | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% | |
| 7 | WU Jiachen | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 8 | BRESLAV Asher | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% |
| 9 | LAU LUCAS | - | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 10 | NOOL Alexander | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
| 11 | CHEN Cameron | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 12 | GUO Benjamin | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 18% | |
| 13 | LIN Lucas | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 4% |
| 14 | BANG Dylan | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 15 | DANG William | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 16 | CHONG Eden | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 17 | HONG Ethen | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | CHEN Aiden | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
| 19 | BHANDARE Veer | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 20 | YAO Ryan | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 21 | BARTON Christian | 21% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | CHIANG William | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 23 | CHEN Hayden | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | FRIZZELL Kai | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 25 | DEVISETTY Sohun | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 26 | NOOL Aaron | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 27 | FOGEL Jake | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 28 | KESELMAN Ron | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | YAO Aiden | - | 3% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 6% | |
| 30 | FANG Charlie | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 31 | JIANG Aidan | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | WAGNER Miles | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 33 | KHERSONSKY Robert | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 34 | JIN Noah | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | WANG Marcus | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 36 | KLOTS Theo | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | MUELLER Travis | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | LI Tyrese | 1% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 39 | DANILOV Artur | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 40 | MERHEJ Sean | 7% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 41 | MONDESIR Aidan Dickson | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 42 | ZHU Brady | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 43 | LAI Jayden | 1% | 11% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 44 | LIU Easun | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 45 | YOU Emmanuel | 23% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | TOPRANI Valmik | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
| 47 | MA Joseph | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 48 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | ZHEN Maxwell | 28% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | VINCENT-GRAVENHISE Malcolm | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 51 | SHAO Mason | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 52 | LEE Ryan | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 53 | KO Ethan | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 54 | MATHEW Benjamin | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | SCHNEIDER Gideon | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 56 | YAO Irvine | 6% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 57 | XU Yunfei(Dorian) | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | CHOI Joshua | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 59 | JAY Vivaan | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 60 | KIMBLE Michael | 1% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 61 | MORRIS Micah | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 62 | NG Zander | 20% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 63 | DUDDA Kavin | 6% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 64 | VAN NAME Connor | 14% | 53% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 65 | HWANG Christopher | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.