Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DIVITO Dylan | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 56% |
2 | CATLIN Adam | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
3 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
3 | OH Jonathan | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
5 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
6 | WU Jerry Z. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
7 | KIM Banseok | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
8 | SCHENCK Theo | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
9 | PHAM-CHANG Duke A. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
10 | LEE David Y. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
11 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
12 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
13 | HODESS Ethan | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
14 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | - |
15 | AMICO Julian F. | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | |
16 | LUNA Emilio | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
17 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 42% | 11% |
18 | RYOU Aiden | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
19 | LI Ryan Z. | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
20 | BAEK David | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
21 | NAM Michael | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
22 | LI Avery Peihong | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
23 | LIM Charles Q. | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
24 | HARRIS Rhonen | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
25 | MO Jason | 12% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
26 | BERSHIN Izzy | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.