Atlantic City Convention Center - Hall D - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | URSU Marcel T. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 2 | ZWAKA Jonas | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 38% |
| 3 | MIAO Heqi | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 3 | CAI xingzhi | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 5 | ZHANG Simon | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 6 | ONUGHA II Emeka | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 10% |
| 7 | CRAWFORD William | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% | |
| 8 | ROPER F. Elijah | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
| 9 | SALDARINI Glenn | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 10 | LIANG Morgan | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 10% |
| 11 | CHEN Felix | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 12 | KUSHKOV Michael | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | MCDONALD Finn | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 14 | TASIKAS Peter | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 15 | WU Vincent | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 16 | LIN Alex | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% | |
| 17 | LIU Eric | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
| 18 | HOUPT Lucas | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 19 | SONG Ryan | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 21 | WAXLER Alex | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 4% |
| 22 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | - | - | 2% | 12% | 37% | 40% | 9% |
| 23 | CONNOLLY Edward Bud | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 24 | LEVY Jack | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 5% |
| 25 | VIDREVICH David | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 26 | BROOKS Drake | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 26 | THOMAS Tre | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | AVERY Marcus | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 29 | KULKARNI Ishir | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | ROMBERG Sam | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 31 | SAYAR Luke | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 32 | CHIANG Ethan | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 33 | ZHERENOVSKY Alan | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 34 | LEE Ryan | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 35 | LORENZ Evan | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 36 | JIN Yubo | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | BANSAL Ariv | 4% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 38 | CORDERO Adam | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | GAIDA Ashton | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | LLOYD Maxwell | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 41 | CHANG Timothy | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 42 | LI Kent | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | PILLAI Akshay | 3% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 44 | NARAYAN Rishi | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 45 | MESSINGER Joshua | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 46 | GRIFFIN Sid | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 47 | HONG Isaac | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | YOUNG Navin | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 49 | LEE Ivan | 26% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | CHAN Ewan | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 51 | GUERRA Corey | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | |
| 52 | JARRETT Benjamin | 14% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | NEUBERGER Jakob Felix | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 54 | AWAD Omar | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 55 | LEIGH Brayden | 5% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 56 | RUBENSON Leo | 38% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | GAO Francis | 2% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 58 | VINCENT Yijia | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | FREILICH Harrison | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 60 | RABEL Alexander | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 61 | RABEL Sebastian | 20% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | LEE SungYup | 63% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.