Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHUNG Thomas | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 2 | ALFARO Justus | V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | NOEL Sebastien A. | D D D V D | V V V V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 3 | SARKAR agniv | V V V D D | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 5 | HUNT Aidan | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 6 | PHUKAN Rohin | V V V V D | V V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 7 | HIGGINS Branford | V V D D V | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 8 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | V D V D V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 9 | RYAN Seth C. | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 10 | KIM Darius H. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 11 | SARKAR Anish | V V V D V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 12 | CROSSMAN Brandon | V D V V V | V D | 0.9 | 4 | +3.1 |
| 13 | MONDALA Adrian | V V D D V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 14 | WANG DEVON | V V D V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 15 | LEE Jaden T. | D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | GUPTA Karan | V D D V V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 17 | DRIBIN Ezra | V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 18 | FERRIERE Joshua | D D V V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 19 | LEE Chun Po | V D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 20 | NGO Ethan | D V V V D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 21 | MCDONALD Ethan | D V D D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 22 | LO Jake | D D V D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 23 | DALVA Michael | D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 24 | KIM Nathan | V D V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 25 | ZAMORA Marcel | D D D V V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 26 | SHA Michael | D V D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 27 | YU Austin | D D V D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 28 | COPEN Samuel S. | D V D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 29 | PAK Elliot | D D D V D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 30 | CHUNG Michael | D D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | BAZHENOV Anthony | D V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 32 | BLANCO Renn | D D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
| 33 | MALEEV Georgy | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 34 | LIPSHUTZ Zachary | D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 35 | SACHS Sebastian | D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 36 | COPEN Elliot P. | V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 37 | BARRESI Isaac | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.