Atlantic City Convention Center - Hall D - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHAN Jolene | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 2 | CAO Amelie | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
| 3 | CAI Ilana | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 3 | XING Melly | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 5 | MA Sophia | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
| 6 | LI Savannah | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 45% | 38% |
| 7 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
| 8 | SON Ayoung | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 40% | 13% |
| 9 | ELLISON Ingrid | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 10 | SFINTESCU Emma | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 45% | 16% |
| 11 | IWERSEN Marte | - | - | - | 7% | 37% | 43% | 13% |
| 12 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 13 | WEN Lillian | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | SICHEL-OUTCALT Margaret | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 15 | YOUM Amelia | 2% | 23% | 44% | 27% | 4% | ||
| 16 | SHANG Arianna | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
| 17 | ZHU Alivia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 28% |
| 18 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 2% | 24% | 45% | 26% | 2% | ||
| 19 | BAULIN Zoya | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% |
| 20 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 3% |
| 21 | ZHILKOV Anya | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 44% | 11% |
| 22 | CHOI Cara | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 23 | SHUI Zola | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | MCCLAIN Madison | 1% | 13% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 25 | SMITH Melinda | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 52% | ||
| 26 | WU Charlotte | 3% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 6% | ||
| 27 | JU Victoria | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | 1% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | DOUGLAS Addison | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
| 30 | HOLLIS Priscillia | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 31 | MCCLELLAN Florence | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | JIN Emily | 5% | 40% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | GOMEZ Amelia | 7% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 34 | KIM Chloe Minjoo | 7% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | EPSTEIN Naomi | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% |
| 36 | COUAILLIER Lou | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 37 | HEMPHILL Mia | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 38 | CLOUD Chrystie | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | RUSTOGI Jyoti | - | 9% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 40 | PAEK Mila | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 41 | HUDSON Sophie | 1% | 12% | 37% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | VO Evelyn | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 42 | KANDALAFT Emma | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | PARK Addison | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | REILLY Carys | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 46 | PAEK Ellie | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | WOLF Fiona | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 48 | CHEN Rachel | 45% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 49 | LIANG Jasmine | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | BROWN Katelyn | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 51 | XU Elaina | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | VUONG Nguyen | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 53 | JOHNSON Elizabeth | 11% | 43% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | ZHU Alicia | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | ||
| 55 | CHEN Sophie | 11% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 56 | BRADSHAW Tamira | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 57 | MIN Claire | 74% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 58 | WARDMAN Abigail | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 59 | ZUCKER Eleanor | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 60 | AKSAKAL Ela | 5% | 28% | 44% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | WEINER Charlotte | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.