Atlantic City Convention Center - Hall D - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Hayden | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
| 2 | YAO Ryan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 53% | 8% |
| 3 | CHEN Aiden | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 26% | |
| 3 | MASKIN Mikhail | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
| 5 | NOOL Aaron | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 41% | |
| 6 | PEGUS Izzy | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 7 | FANG Charlie | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% | |
| 8 | YAO Aiden | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
| 9 | CHEN INCHON | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
| 10 | DAI Jason | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 11 | BRATU Max | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 12 | CHIANG William | - | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 13 | LAI Jayden | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% | |
| 14 | KOVAC Blake | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 6% |
| 15 | SHAO Mason | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 16 | VINCENT-GRAVENHISE Malcolm | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 17 | CHEN Daniel | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% | |
| 18 | MA Joseph | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 6% |
| 19 | KO Ethan | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 18% | |
| 20 | LEE Taeryum | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 21 | BUTLER Xavier | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 22 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | YIN Xiangheng | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 24 | NG Remy | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% | |
| 25 | ZHEN Maxwell | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 26 | GORE Noah | 4% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 27 | JIN Noah | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | |
| 28 | XU Yunfei(Dorian) | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 29 | SHKOP Alexander | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | PINCIROLI Tommaso | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
| 31 | ZHAO Eric | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | LITVINOVSKY Benjamin | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | SALIBA Jackson | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 34 | KIM Brendan | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 35 | ZHANG Jacob | 8% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 36 | LAI Jaxon | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 37 | LIU FREDERICK | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 38 | HWANG Chase | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | GUJJA Rishabh | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 40 | LU Shawn | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 41 | GOH Cayden | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 42 | HWANG Christopher | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | YADAV Aarav | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | HONG Evan | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | |
| 45 | CHEN Regis | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 46 | YAO Irvine | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 47 | WAGNER Miles | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 48 | YOU Emmanuel | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 49 | YAN Milan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 50 | PENG Leo | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% | |
| 51 | DUDDA Kavin | 11% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 52 | IVANOV Andrew | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 53 | MAK Nolan | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 54 | SHABBIR Mohammad Amaan | 4% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | PRIETO Cole | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 56 | WILSON Henry | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | CRUZ Juno | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 58 | LAW Benjamin | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 59 | SALA John | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 60 | HENRIQUEZ Juan Mateo | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 61 | KO Caden | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 62 | TANG David | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 63 | CHARNA Luca | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 64 | JORDAN JR. Louis | 64% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.