Auburn University Recreation and Wellness Center - Auburn, AL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | PUFFENBERGER Daniel | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
| 2 | SORANNO James | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 3 | DUNKLIN Devon | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 3 | PHILLIPS Carson | D D D V V D | V V V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 5 | GAYFORD Zachary | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 6 | NGUYEN Wesley | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 7 | HANNER Robert | V V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | HARRIS Brendan | D V D V D | V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 9 | OLSON Lucas | V V D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 10 | WENTWORTH Ashley | D V V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 11 | CALINSKY Zachary | V V V V D D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 12 | WYNN Paul | D D V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 13 | PETERS Joelle | V D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 14 | MCNAIR William | V D V V D D | V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 15 | MARTINEZ Cameron | D V D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | HAAS Lindsey | D V V D D | V V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 17 | MEILAN William | V V V V V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 18 | GEISSLER Maximilian | V V V D V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 19 | MENDEZ SILVA Matias | D V V D V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 20 | GUY Austin | V V V D V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 21 | POSEY Callum | V D V V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 22 | WERTH Mario | V V D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 23 | SUMMEY Travis | V V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 24 | RETZER Phillip | D V D V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 25 | JACKSON Nathan | D V D D V | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 26 | BANHOLZER Connor | V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 27 | VARNER Kathryn | D V V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 28 | CARON Lucas | V D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 29 | HOUSMANS Emma | D D D D V | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 30 | WASH James | V D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 31 | EDWARDS John | D D D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 32 | WOLLITZ Addison | D D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 33 | DUNKLE Carson | D D V D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 34 | MAY Cooper | D D D D V | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 35 | HERNDON Rylee | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 36 | CONCANNON Evelyn | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 37 | CHEN Ketai | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 38 | SHANNON Sarabeth | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 39 | CHRISTIAN Antonio | D D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.