Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GOLDIN Nina | - | - | - | 6% | 27% | 45% | 22% |
| 2 | FERRIS Madeline | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
| 3 | WANG Tina | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 19% | |
| 3 | LI Miranda | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 5 | LEMMEN Jasmijn | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 6 | YANG Caroline | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 7 | TANG Wing Ka Ariana | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 29% |
| 8 | KAZA Ananya | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 9 | FEENER Paige | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 10 | KAZA Aditi | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 11 | ERPELDING Emily | 14% | 41% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 12 | IREGUI Sofia | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 13 | KNULL Emma | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 14% | 3% |
| 14 | BARCZAY Sara E. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 15 | JI Xinya | 5% | 21% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 16 | WILLEMSE Jamie | - | - | 2% | 16% | 41% | 33% | 8% |
| 17 | CARLUCCI Laura A. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 9% |
| 18 | LI Meredith | 22% | 45% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 19 | DEVASIA Nisha | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 20 | CHIU Philippa | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | RAMAN Indira | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 22 | AMBALONG Jody P. | - | < 1% | 5% | 21% | 44% | 30% | |
| 23 | WONG Lucia | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 24 | DEWSNUP Kelly | - | < 1% | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
| 24 | ALSHAARAWI Sofia | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | SOUTHERLAND Nina | - | 5% | 31% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 27 | MASLEN Cheryl L. | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.