Atlantic City Convention Center - Hall D - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | URSU Marcel T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | |
| 2 | ZWAKA Jonas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 36% | |
| 3 | LEVY Jack | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 3 | CAI xingzhi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 5 | LORENZ Evan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 6 | NELSON Micah | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 7 | MCDONALD Finn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
| 8 | BANSAL Krishiv | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 28% | |
| 10 | MIAO Heqi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 11 | JI Johnson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
| 12 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | |
| 13 | CIEMINS Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
| 14 | DE SIENA Salvatore | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | 7% | |
| 15 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 26% | 3% | |
| 16 | KUSHKOV Michael | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | ROMBERG Sam | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | LIANG Morgan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | LIU Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 20 | ZHANG Simon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 21 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% |
| 22 | JANG Junyeong | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 23 | CHEN Felix | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 24 | TSAO Alister | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 25 | ZAY Elijah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | CHANG Timothy | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 27 | WU Vincent | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | CRAWFORD William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 29 | HOUSER Johnathan | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | LEUNG Arthur | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 31 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
| 32 | STEWART Samuel | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | MANESCU Miron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 34 | JIANG Terence | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 35 | JAGANNATHAN Ajay | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
| 36 | MACK Justin | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 38 | MARSHQUIST Miles | 100% | 75% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 39 | BELAND Riley James "RJ" | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
| 39 | YANG Byron | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | JARAMILLO Juan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 9% | 1% | |
| 42 | BALE ATMAN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 27% | |
| 43 | EASLEY Dallas | 100% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | FORCE Joel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 45 | SONG Ryan | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | SANTOS Theodore | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 2% |
| 47 | MARTINEZ Luke | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | LIEU Nicholas | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | KAPOOR Krish | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | FREILICH Harrison | 100% | 91% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | HAUSLER Jayden | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 51 | YOUNG Navin | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | CHIEN Nolan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 54 | MUKHERJEE Aryan | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | VAN KOERT Akash | 100% | 98% | 79% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 56 | JIN Yubo | 100% | 73% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 57 | CONRADO David | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | COBITZ Harrison | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | GRIFFIN Sid | 100% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 60 | THACH Tri | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.