Alachua, FL - Alachua, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | MEJIAS Wolfang E. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 2 | MOORE Jeremy S. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 47% | 22% |
| 3 | RUSSANOV Boris J. | - | 6% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 2% |
| 3 | CEKAN Luis | - | - | 1% | 12% | 49% | 38% |
| 5 | THAYER Jake T. | 3% | 25% | 43% | 25% | 4% | |
| 6 | HANDBERG Paul | 1% | 16% | 43% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 7 | SILVER Cameron | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
| 8 | DONDERIS Jared M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% |
| 9 | FREY Wayne N. | - | 2% | 19% | 48% | 28% | 4% |
| 10 | STEELE Demario A. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
| 11 | GORIUNOV Ivan A. | - | 9% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 2% |
| 12 | THAYER Bryce | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 37% | 7% |
| 13 | SAN JUAN Carlos | 6% | 35% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 14 | YIM Alex | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 25% |
| 15 | RUSSANOV Dennis | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 16 | HARRINGTON Joseph | 12% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 1% | |
| 17 | GARCIA Christopher W. | 2% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | ARIZA Isaac A. | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% |
| 19 | BUTLER Evan | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 20 | LUTTON James C. | 1% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 12% | |
| 21 | MCFARLAND John G. | 25% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 22 | ALVIOR Jacob A. | 1% | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 23 | BOWDEN William | 50% | 41% | 8% | - | - | - |
| 24 | MUNSHI Isaac | 13% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 25 | SLOTER Lewis E. | 18% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 26 | BRACELIS Josias L. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% |
| 27 | BRETON Jayden | 10% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 28 | DUPREE Thomas | 56% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 29 | MAVRODIEV Nickolay | 96% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.