Atlantic City Convention Center - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ISAYENKO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
| 2 | KOREN George | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% |
| 3 | PARK Layne | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% | |
| 3 | ALUF William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 27% |
| 5 | ZHANG Weihang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 6 | CHEN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% | |
| 7 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 8 | CIECIEREGA MATTHEW | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
| 9 | LEVY Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% |
| 10 | PARK Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 12% |
| 11 | CHEN Harrison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 12 | HU Simon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 11% |
| 13 | HENDERSON Louis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 14 | ZHAO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 15 | WANG Harrison | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 1% |
| 16 | SCHWARTZMAN Jakub | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 17 | ARTETA-CHEVALIER Ulysse | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 18 | LEE Shane Gunn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 19 | TO Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 20 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 21 | FAVO Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
| 22 | MAKLIN David | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 23 | CHEN Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 24 | LI Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 11% | |
| 25 | GUCCIARDI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 26 | BASU MALLICK Sannibh | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 27 | ARUN Viyaan | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 28 | RISMAN Edward | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | PETROSYAN Aleksander | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | MIDDELBEEK Maarten | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 31 | LEE Augustine | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 32 | HEILMANN Christian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | LLOYD Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 34 | ZHANG Howard | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 35 | O'KEEFE Brody | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 4% |
| 36 | GOLDSTEIN Malcolm | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | BARAKH Adam | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | THEETHIRA Kevin-Cariappa | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 39 | TERENTIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 8% |
| 40 | WANG Russell | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
| 41 | VITALE NIKO | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 42 | GHIM Ethan | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 43 | LI Anton | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 44 | SABINO Bennett | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 45 | HEILMANN Caleb | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 46 | SOLEJ miles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
| 47 | BROOKS Grant | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 48 | HUANG KIMBALL | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | LI Felix | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | LEIGH Anthony | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 51 | BORNHOLZ Lawrence | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 52 | LEVY Rafa | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 52 | LI FangKe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
| 54 | HO Alexander | 100% | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 55 | YU Dylan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 56 | VINCENT Yian | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 57 | YUE Wesley | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | RAJMOHAN Syon | 100% | 73% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | DIORIO James | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 60 | FIGUS Fabio | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | KARRI Anish | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 62 | TIAN Michael | 100% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | TIAN Alex | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 64 | FRANTZ Ken | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 65 | ZHANG Leon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 66 | ZHANG Mark | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
| 67 | CONSTANTINE Leonidas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 68 | BELTRAN-PRATS Enzo | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 68 | TANG Nicholas | 100% | 85% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | XIAO August | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 71 | MALM Gabriel | 100% | 95% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 72 | COBEY James | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 73 | LIUZHANG Ben | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 74 | MULCAHEY Kieran | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 75 | JOHN Christian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 76 | KWON Joon | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 77 | GENTELA Pradyumna | 100% | 99% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 77 | GUO Joe | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 79 | FERNAINE Thomas | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 80 | KNOBEL Benjamin | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 81 | BORROK Andrew | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 82 | KISHORE Rishaan | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 83 | WONG Jacob | 100% | 98% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 84 | PALERMO Evan | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 85 | PRENDINGUE Michael | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 86 | RUBINSHTEYN Leib | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 87 | YAN Kaysen | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 88 | BUCKLEY Charlie | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 88 | IP Ethan | 100% | 36% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.