Power Sports Academy - Martinez, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAHAPATRA Alisha | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
| 2 | CHUNG Charlotte | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 3 | SHU Kayla | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 3 | ZHAI Muyan | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 5 | KIM Rylie | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
| 6 | TUNG Alison | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 7 | GOWDA Adisha | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 8 | KO Alyssa | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
| 9 | GAO Nicole | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 10 | TAGNE Zoey | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
| 11 | PICACHE Camilla | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 12 | GU Alexandra | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 9% | |
| 13 | ISAAC Felicity | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | CHANG Audrey | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 15 | MARENITCH Kara | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 16 | SHEN Rebecca | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 17 | MURPHY Ava | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | LI Claire | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% |
| 19 | SCHOR Katherine | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | CHENG Jessica | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 21 | SONI Olivia | 16% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 22 | GUPTA Nyra | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% |
| 23 | SUN Zoey | 3% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | LEE Madison | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 25 | CHEN Yingying | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | |
| 26 | DONG Ena | 10% | 30% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 27 | LOPEZ-HOR Emma Meixian | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | KNOX aysa | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 29 | KIM Olivia | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | DU Zoey | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | SINGH Aditi | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | SUN Leia | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 33 | YANG Lucy | 26% | 51% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 34 | MAHAJAN Mira | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | TAM Alisa | 1% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 36 | GUAN Angie | < 1% | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 37 | GOODFELLOW Amelia | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | GUO Antong | 47% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | NG Genevieve | 32% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | HOU Alice | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 41 | KARTHIK Anuhya | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.