Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CAO Amelie | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 51% |
| 2 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
| 3 | LI Savannah | - | - | 2% | 20% | 48% | 30% | |
| 3 | TELEB Farida | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 49% | 27% |
| 5 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% | ||
| 6 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
| 7 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
| 8 | DONG Iris | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 39% | 10% |
| 9 | LI Joy | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 10 | GENG Emma | - | - | 2% | 14% | 46% | 32% | 6% |
| 11 | CHUNG Stella | - | 1% | 13% | 46% | 34% | 7% | |
| 12 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | - | 2% | 21% | 47% | 30% | |
| 13 | ZHU Alivia | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% | |
| 14 | HAFEZ Sahar | - | - | 3% | 15% | 38% | 39% | 5% |
| 15 | BO Iris | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 5% |
| 16 | LUO Lucy | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 17 | XING Melly | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% | |
| 18 | KOESTERS Cecilie | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 19 | WANG Wenxi | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 20 | KIM Lael | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 21 | MILLER Anna | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 22 | ZHU Audrey | 1% | 15% | 44% | 35% | 5% | ||
| 23 | ZHILKOV Anya | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 19% | |
| 23 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
| 25 | LEE Sohyung Missing ID | |||||||
| 26 | KOESTERS Florentine | 1% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | CHAN Jolene | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 47% | 35% |
| 28 | HOU Xu | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 29 | KUANG Bella | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 30 | SHUTZER Lily | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 31 | KIRBY Emelie | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 32 | YAN Miduo Missing ID | |||||||
| 33 | HONG Mabel | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | GE Deanna | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
| 35 | WARDMAN Abigail | 8% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | ZELDIN Nina | 15% | 44% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | MCCLELLAN Florence | 27% | 49% | 21% | 3% | - | ||
| 38 | MA Sophia | 1% | 13% | 41% | 38% | 7% | ||
| 39 | XU Elaina | 26% | 57% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | SICHEL-OUTCALT Margaret | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SARAVANA Supriti | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 42 | SMART Athena | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 43 | TANG Clementine | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | KANDALAFT Emma | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | BENNETT Emi | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | JU Victoria | 3% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 47 | GOMEZ Amelia | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 48 | ONTSO Eleanor | 1% | 16% | 53% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 49 | ZHU Joanna | 15% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | KIM Chloe Minjoo | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | MA Cloris | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | COUAILLIER Lou | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | - |
| 53 | BENTLEY Amelia | 5% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | GONG Maggie | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | CHESK Kamila | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 56 | JOHNSON Elizabeth | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | DAVIS Gabriella | 56% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | ZHU Alicia | 46% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 59 | CLOUD Chrystie | 38% | 46% | 14% | 1% | - | ||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.