Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CAO Amelie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 2 | JIANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
| 3 | LI Savannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 30% | |
| 3 | TELEB Farida | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 27% |
| 5 | DE CASTRO Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | ||
| 6 | ZHENG Annalyn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
| 7 | SHIN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
| 8 | DONG Iris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% | 10% |
| 9 | LI Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% |
| 10 | GENG Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 39% | 6% |
| 11 | CHUNG Stella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 41% | 7% | |
| 12 | MURPHY Genevieve | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 30% | |
| 13 | ZHU Alivia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% | |
| 14 | HAFEZ Sahar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 5% |
| 15 | BO Iris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 5% |
| 16 | LUO Lucy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 17 | XING Melly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% | |
| 18 | KOESTERS Cecilie | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 19 | WANG Wenxi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 20 | KIM Lael | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 21 | MILLER Anna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 22 | ZHU Audrey | 100% | 99% | 84% | 40% | 5% | ||
| 23 | ZHILKOV Anya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 23 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 25 | LEE Sohyung Missing ID | |||||||
| 26 | KOESTERS Florentine | 100% | 99% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 27 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 35% |
| 28 | HOU Xu | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 29 | KUANG Bella | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 30 | SHUTZER Lily | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 31 | KIRBY Emelie | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 32 | YAN Miduo Missing ID | |||||||
| 33 | HONG Mabel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 34 | GE Deanna | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
| 35 | WARDMAN Abigail | 100% | 92% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | ZELDIN Nina | 100% | 85% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | MCCLELLAN Florence | 100% | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | ||
| 38 | MA Sophia | 100% | 99% | 86% | 45% | 7% | ||
| 39 | XU Elaina | 100% | 74% | 18% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | SICHEL-OUTCALT Margaret | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SARAVANA Supriti | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 42 | SMART Athena | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 43 | TANG Clementine | 100% | 91% | 59% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | KANDALAFT Emma | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | BENNETT Emi | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | JU Victoria | 100% | 97% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 47 | GOMEZ Amelia | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 48 | ONTSO Eleanor | 100% | 99% | 83% | 29% | 4% | - | |
| 49 | ZHU Joanna | 100% | 85% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | KIM Chloe Minjoo | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | MA Cloris | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | COUAILLIER Lou | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | - |
| 53 | BENTLEY Amelia | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | GONG Maggie | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | CHESK Kamila | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 56 | JOHNSON Elizabeth | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | DAVIS Gabriella | 100% | 44% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | ZHU Alicia | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 59 | CLOUD Chrystie | 100% | 62% | 16% | 2% | - | ||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.