Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 2 | MEYERSON Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
| 3 | BUSH Bethany | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 3 | FUNG Iris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 5 | NIU Jessica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 6 | CAI Xinyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 16% |
| 7 | MOON Claire | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 8 | LIU Chelsea | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 4% |
| 9 | KANG Soeun | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 10 | DUTA Lyra | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 11 | ZHANG Ashley | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% | |
| 12 | MACKAY Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 13 | NANDA Maanika | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | ZHAO Selena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 15 | KO Ariel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 16 | SMITH Genevieve | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 17 | GONG Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% |
| 18 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 19 | ZHANG Wuxin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | UZAR Julianna | 100% | 98% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 21 | LAFFY Lily | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 22 | NG Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
| 23 | YANG Selina | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 24 | KU Chloe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% | |
| 25 | WANG JiaQi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | |
| 26 | PARK Chloe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 27 | KIM isabel | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 28 | HU Alicia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 29 | SUN Yi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% |
| 30 | ONO Lisa | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | WANG MONA | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 32 | ZHANG Zoe Muchen | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 33 | WONG Charlene | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 34 | MADDISON Estelle | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | < 1% | - | - |
| 35 | MISHRA Riona | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 36 | PARK Gabriella | 100% | 95% | 67% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | HILD Anya | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 38 | POWERS Waverly | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 39 | BERRIOS Catalina | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 40 | MOTOVA Masha | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 41 | LIU Stephanie | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 43 | OH Chloe | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | TASSONE Charlie | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | YOUNG Sienna | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 45 | LIU Alyssa | 100% | 84% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | HU Sophia | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | HUANG Zoe | 100% | 93% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | MULHERN Eleanor | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | PARKER Mrinali | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | YIN Xizi | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | KIM Jodie | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 53 | LIU Teresa | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | BROGAN Samantha | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.