Power Sports Academy - Martinez, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Ariana | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% | |
| 2 | HOM Avery | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
| 3 | CHAN Mila | - | - | - | - | 6% | 38% | 56% |
| 3 | CHO Karis | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 43% | 7% | |
| 5 | YANG Hanli | - | - | - | - | 6% | 36% | 58% |
| 6 | CHAN Ella | - | - | 1% | 9% | 45% | 45% | |
| 7 | MIYOSHI Kylie | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 8 | HSU Rachel | - | - | 6% | 26% | 46% | 22% | |
| 9 | MA Isabelle | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 62% |
| 10 | HOM Emma | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% | |
| 10 | JIN Jada Y | - | - | 2% | 18% | 49% | 31% | |
| 12 | LAM Dorris Yandor | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 13 | LEE Zoe E. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 47% | 36% | |
| 14 | SHEN Gloria | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% | |
| 15 | TEWARI Amaira | - | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 8% |
| 16 | JOESUF Thea | - | 14% | 39% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | PAN Samantha | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 17% | 2% | |
| 18 | KIM Ines | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 19 | LIN Avery | - | - | 2% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 8% |
| 20 | NICOLETTI Thea | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 21 | CHANG Olivia | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% | |
| 22 | CHUNG Charlotte | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 23 | VALOUEVA Katerina | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 24 | LI Sophia | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 25 | FANG Kelervia | - | - | 2% | 16% | 52% | 31% | |
| 26 | SMIRNOV Victoria | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 26 | THOTA Akira | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 28 | CHENG Audrey | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 29 | MCLANAHAN Jasmine | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 30 | IRELAND Moira | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | CHOI Jian | 1% | 22% | 43% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 32 | LAI Olivia | 3% | 23% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | ZHAN Catherine | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% | |
| 34 | DVOIRIS Maya | - | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 49% | 16% |
| 35 | KIM Audrey | 2% | 22% | 47% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | HSU Emily | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 51% | 19% |
| 37 | LI Audrey | 1% | 21% | 43% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 38 | BHANGOO Paloma | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
| 39 | ZHANG Annabelle | 3% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | ZHANG Katie Q. | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 40 | KAIMAN Tabby | 7% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | YANG Byanca | 8% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | ZHU Claire | 4% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | COLIC LANI | 10% | 47% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | ARUNKISHORE Dakshina | 5% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | KHANAL Sarah | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 47 | ALEKSANDROVA Mira | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | LEE Abigail | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 44% | 15% | 1% |
| 48 | FENG Sophia | 20% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 50 | DONG Nancy | 4% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 51 | LAVERY Lucy | - | 5% | 27% | 46% | 19% | 2% | |
| 52 | PAWAR Sanvi | 11% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | LUO Olivia | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | |
| 54 | WANG Ellen | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 55 | GUO Jianing | 35% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 56 | TUNG Alison | 9% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | YU Xintong | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 58 | SOUSA Lauren | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 59 | LIU Madeleine | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 60 | YANG Claire | 13% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | HSU Courtney | 89% | 11% | - | - | - | - | |
| 62 | DEJOY Leilah | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 63 | CHAN Amelia | 65% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 64 | YEN Kayleigh | 29% | 45% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 65 | TANG Ming-Hao (Audrey) | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 66 | ERDMAN-SINESIO Sophia | 40% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 67 | WONG Iris | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 68 | JUSON Julianne Missing ID | |||||||
| 69 | THERIOT Reagan | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 70 | STOCK Nina | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 71 | CHEN Celina | 29% | 50% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.