Bay Regional Fencing Alliance - Freeland, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | BECKER Thomas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
3 | COLWELL Alex | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | < 1% |
3 | HUDSON Greg | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% |
5 | GREEN Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
6 | DALTON Matthew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 2% |
7 | CHANG Aubin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
9 | MEYERS Peter | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
10 | HARM Michael | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
11 | ALARIE James | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
12 | GREEN Zachary | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
13 | OWENS Nathan J | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
14 | MORRISON Chris | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
15 | NORCONK Craig | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
16 | HENDRIAN Rachel | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
17 | NORCONK Claire | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
19 | GRIFFIN Martha A. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
20 | SAGE Kayla | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
21 | OWENS Andrew | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
22 | DRAYTON Hannah | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
23 | GREEN Scott | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
24 | BASS Simon | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
25 | MAYO Eric | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
26 | GREEN Douglas | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
27 | NICHOLSON Dwayne | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
28 | MCBURNEY Karen | 100% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
29 | LESPERANCE Jordan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
30 | SOMERLOTT Logan | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.