Canlan Sports Lake Barrington - BARRINGTON, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LATORRE Leonardo | V V D V V V | V V V V V V | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
| 2 | LU Alex | V V V V V | V V V V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
| 3 | FANG Haoyu | V V V V V V | V V V D | 0.0 | 6 | +6.0 |
| 3 | ZHENG Lerui | V V D V V | V V V V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 5 | ZHAO Jason | V V V V V | V V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
| 6 | MORALES Tycho | V V V V V V | V V D | 0.0 | 6 | +6.0 |
| 7 | ZHOU Justin | V D V V V V | V V V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
| 8 | TAN Charlie | V V V D V | V V V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 9 | FOSTERVOLD Castiel | V V V V V | V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
| 10 | WEBSTER Liam | V V V V V | V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
| 11 | JIAO Daniel | V V V V V | V D | 0.0 | 5 | +5.0 |
| 12 | LI Andy | V V V D V | V V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 13 | WANG Freyr | V V V D V | V V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 14 | HOOVER Timothy | D V V V V D | V V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 15 | SU Aiden | V V D V D V | V V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 16 | FERGUSON Levi | D D V V D D | V V D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
| 17 | CHEN Kyler | V V V V D | V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 18 | XU Rambert | V V V V D | V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 19 | WANG Jaaziel | V V D V V D | V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 20 | KAGAN Noah | V V D D V V | V D | 0.0 | 4 | +4.0 |
| 21 | WENGER Rowan | V V D D V | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 22 | LINEBERRY CADEN | V V D V D | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 23 | MCCOOL Henry | V D V V D | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 24 | BODNER Nicholas | V D V D V | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 25 | HUANG Lucas | D V V V D | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 26 | YU Oliver | D V V D D V | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 27 | ZHANG Hanson | V V D D D V | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 28 | CORAN Roland | D D V V D V | V D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 29 | WILLIAMS Thomas | D D D V V | V D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
| 30 | HARDWICK Alex | D V D D D | V D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 31 | CHAN William | D D D V D | V D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 32 | KLINE Benjamin | D D V D D | V D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 33 | CROSSETT Peter | V D D V V | D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 34 | DHALIWAL Zorawar Singh | D V V D V | D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 35 | MEI Edan | V V D V D | D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 36 | MATIYASH Andrew | D V V D V | D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 37 | XU Jason | D D D V V V | D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 38 | YANG Haopeng | D V V V D D | D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 39 | WANG kevin | D V V D D V | D | 0.0 | 3 | +3.0 |
| 40 | LI Jensen | D D V D V | D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
| 41 | JAIN Kavya | D D V V D | D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
| 42 | LIM Cayden | V D V D D D | D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
| 43 | TAGORE Ayansh | D D D D V V | D | 0.0 | 2 | +2.0 |
| 44 | AN Jacob | D D D D V | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 45 | CHEN Evan | D D D D V | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 45 | MARVEL Elliot | D D D V D | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 47 | MADDES Gage | V D D D D | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 48 | STAMPS Jasper | D D D V D | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 49 | PARK Nathan | D V D D D D | D | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 |
| 50 | ZHAI Noah | D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 51 | CHEN Kyle | D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 52 | XUE Lucas | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 53 | HILDEBRANDT Gerhard | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 54 | VALERI Ryan | D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 55 | STEPHAN Tyler | D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 56 | NETESA Lukian | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 57 | ZHAN Ethan | D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.