Power Sports Academy - Martinez, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHO Jacey | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 2 | LEE Emily | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 28% | |
| 3 | LIN Laura | - | 2% | 20% | 48% | 31% | ||
| 3 | GIERAT-KATZ Izabella | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% | |
| 5 | ZHAO Ellie | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 6 | LI Anna | - | 2% | 22% | 49% | 27% | ||
| 7 | KIM Vivian | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 8 | BURKS Madison | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 3% |
| 9 | BUDMAN Ava | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 10 | SUNG Audrey | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 11 | YUNG Bethany | - | 5% | 27% | 45% | 23% | ||
| 12 | LI Allison | - | 2% | 17% | 43% | 31% | 7% | |
| 13 | LI Yunxuan (Joy) | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% |
| 14 | LIN Isabel | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 36% | |
| 15 | BUCA Nora | - | - | 5% | 27% | 47% | 21% | |
| 16 | ARULKUMAR Lashia | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 17 | XU Amy Missing ID | |||||||
| 18 | RASHID Summer | - | 9% | 35% | 41% | 15% | ||
| 19 | HANKINS Morgan | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
| 20 | RADOV Una | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 21 | REN Ivanka | 10% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 22 | BI Zoey Missing ID | |||||||
| 23 | ZHU Anna | 22% | 46% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 24 | YU Chloe | - | 4% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% | |
| 25 | CHEN Julia Z. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 26 | HUANG Jui-An | 4% | 41% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | LEONG Andrea | 9% | 46% | 34% | 9% | 1% | ||
| 28 | DEJOY Leilah | 8% | 34% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | SINGLETARY Iona | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | CHIOU-WILLIAMS Matea | 1% | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 31 | BACK Ella | 23% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | TRUONG Audrey | 30% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | DYMAR Anna | - | 7% | 42% | 40% | 11% | ||
| 34 | LEE Adelynn | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 35 | KANDALA Aanya | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 36 | RAPTIS Layla | 11% | 44% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | KAYMAN June | 44% | 47% | 8% | 1% | - | ||
| 38 | GARCIA Sophia Noelle | 1% | 18% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | WANG Nicole | - | 7% | 32% | 43% | 18% | ||
| 40 | CHANG Mikayla | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | STEPHAN Ella Whitney | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 42 | SMIRNOVA Evangelina | 69% | 27% | 3% | - | - | ||
| 43 | WARBURTON Eleanor | 61% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 43 | TAGKOPOULOS Bella | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 45 | SIDHU Myra | 37% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | ||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.