Power Sports Academy - Martinez, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | CHAN Mila | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 2 | WU Chingfei Amber | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 3 | LUO Miranda | - | - | 1% | 7% | 37% | 55% |
| 3 | MA Isabelle | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
| 5 | LI Alice | - | - | - | 9% | 91% | |
| 6 | MIYOSHI Kylie | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 20% | |
| 7 | JOESUF Thea | 2% | 15% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 8 | KIM Natalie | - | - | 6% | 29% | 48% | 17% |
| 9 | CHAN Ella | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 48% |
| 10 | ARYA Leela | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% |
| 11 | SHEN Gloria | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
| 12 | LEE Abigail | - | 3% | 33% | 59% | 4% | |
| 13 | CHO Karis | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% | |
| 14 | AHN Hayley | 1% | 8% | 32% | 42% | 16% | 2% |
| 15 | HSU Emily | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
| 16 | FANG Kelervia | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 46% | 14% |
| 17 | LI Chelsea | - | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 29% |
| 18 | TEWARI Amaira | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | KIM Lauren | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | COLIC LANI | 50% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | JIN Jada Y | - | - | 4% | 20% | 46% | 30% |
| 22 | LAVERY Lucy | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 23 | ZHANG Katie Q. | 24% | 49% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | JOESUF Aurielle | 2% | 19% | 57% | 23% | - | |
| 25 | PAWAR Sanvi | 8% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 26 | LAM Dorris Yandor | 2% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | YANG Hanli | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
| 28 | MCLANAHAN Jasmine | 1% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | HSU Rachel | 1% | 10% | 35% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
| 30 | LIN Avery | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 31 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 1% | 6% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
| 32 | POEI Meagan | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | PAN Samantha | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 34 | DVOIRIS Maya | 2% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | YU Xintong | 18% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 36 | THERIOT Reagan | 32% | 54% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | TAN Shouyin | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | CHENG Audrey | 2% | 16% | 41% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | TAI Taphanie | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | IRELAND Moira | 9% | 38% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 41 | YANG Byanca | 40% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | BHANGOO Paloma | 14% | 45% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | FENG Sophia | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | SOUSA Lauren | 48% | 44% | 7% | - | - | |
| 45 | WANG Ellen | 17% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 46 | LIU Madeleine | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.