Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 2 | JIN Yucheng | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 49% | 7% | |
| 3 | EVANS Desmond | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 74% |
| 3 | ZHOU jiatong | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% | |
| 5 | LIN Sampson | - | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 40% | 11% |
| 6 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% |
| 7 | MENG Andy | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 24% | |
| 8 | MA Justin | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% | |
| 9 | ZHANG William | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 50% | ||
| 10 | WANG Eason | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 12% | |
| 11 | TROYANKER Makar | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% | |
| 12 | XU Daniel | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 29% | 3% |
| 13 | LEE Juneau | - | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 5% |
| 14 | WU Silin | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
| 15 | MENG Eric | 3% | 21% | 45% | 27% | 4% | ||
| 16 | YIN Luke | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 17 | CHENG Alvin | - | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 27% | 3% |
| 18 | TAN benjamin | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 19 | HUANG Owen | - | 7% | 33% | 45% | 14% | ||
| 20 | WANG Charles | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
| 21 | ZHANG alex | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
| 22 | SASOMSUP Kaison | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | LEE Elliot | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | KIM Ryan | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 25 | ZUO Thomas | 6% | 40% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | WU Kangdi | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 27 | KUK Francis | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | LIN Evan | 1% | 13% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 29 | LIU Kingston | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 30 | BAGWELL Theodore | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 31% | 8% | - |
| 31 | NGO Lincoln | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 32 | KIM Noah | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | KHANDAN MILAN | 34% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - | ||
| 34 | ZHOU Osborn | 28% | 47% | 22% | 3% | - | ||
| 35 | BHANGOO Arman | 5% | 34% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | GOLDSMID Owen | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | NGUYEN Rhys | 3% | 26% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | NGUYEN Remy | 18% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | DOMANTAY Dylan | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | HOVAGHIMIAN Atticus | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | LIEU Kenneth | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | SINGH Shiv | 13% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | ZHAO Jonathan Li | < 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 22% | 3% | |
| 45 | KWOK Ethan | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.