MAPLEWOOD, NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 2 | XU Grace (XinYi) | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
| 3 | COBERT Helen G. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 47% | 23% | |
| 3 | CHAN Elizabeth | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
| 5 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 6 | NING Emma | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 42% | |
| 7 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% | |
| 8 | KIM Rachael | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 3% |
| 9 | SAAL Anna | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 10 | LIN Katie Y. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 11 | GU Sarah | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
| 12 | KOKES Ava | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 13 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
| 14 | MAO Amy | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 15 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 18% | |
| 16 | WANG anne | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 17 | SHEN Stephanie | - | 6% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 18 | ZHANG Tina | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 42% | 16% |
| 19 | MING Cynthia | 10% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | PAN Michelle | 1% | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
| 21 | DE JAGER Celine | - | 6% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | |
| 22 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 41% | 12% | |
| 23 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | 1% | 6% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 4% | |
| 24 | LI Alisha | 5% | 29% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | ZENG Katrina | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | YAO Jillian | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | |
| 27 | SMUK Daria A. | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 6% | |
| 28 | BLIN Margaux J. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 28 | JOSEPH mikayla | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | HONG Elaine | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | CANNEY Lauren | 1% | 14% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 33 | SINGH Aayushi | 78% | 20% | 2% | < 1% | - | - | - |
| 34 | MIETUS Isabelle | 33% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 35 | HICKS Grace | 15% | 41% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | GUZZI Jordan | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | NAYAK Mira | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | BONAR Natalia | 17% | 52% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | LIN Julia L. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 40 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 33% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 41 | LEE Anna | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 41 | DENG Annie | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | ZAKHAROV Anne E. | 1% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 44 | BRASH Olivia | 19% | 51% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.