MAPLEWOOD, NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
2 | XU Grace (XinYi) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | |
3 | COBERT Helen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 23% | |
3 | CHAN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
5 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 28% | |
6 | NING Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
7 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% | |
8 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
9 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
10 | LIN Katie Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% |
11 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 21% | |
12 | KOKES Ava | 100% | 95% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
13 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
14 | MAO Amy | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
15 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% | |
16 | WANG anne | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
17 | SHEN Stephanie | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
18 | ZHANG Tina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 16% |
19 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
20 | PAN Michelle | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
21 | DE JAGER Celine | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 4% | |
22 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 12% | |
23 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 4% | |
24 | LI Alisha | 100% | 95% | 65% | 23% | 3% | - | |
25 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
26 | YAO Jillian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | |
27 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% | 6% | |
28 | BLIN Margaux J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
28 | JOSEPH mikayla | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
30 | HONG Elaine | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
31 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
32 | CANNEY Lauren | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - |
33 | SINGH Aayushi | 100% | 22% | 2% | < 1% | - | - | - |
34 | MIETUS Isabelle | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
35 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 85% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | |
36 | GUZZI Jordan | 100% | 46% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
37 | NAYAK Mira | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
38 | BONAR Natalia | 100% | 83% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
39 | LIN Julia L. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
40 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 100% | 67% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
41 | LEE Anna | 100% | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
41 | DENG Annie | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
43 | ZAKHAROV Anne E. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
44 | BRASH Olivia | 100% | 81% | 31% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.