MAPLEWOOD, NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHUSID Renata M. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
2 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 7% |
3 | MASSICK Laine | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
3 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 45% | 40% |
5 | KIM Rachael | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
6 | HE Fenghuan | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 47% | 23% |
7 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
8 | LI Meilin | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
9 | LIN Ashley | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
10 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
11 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 18% | 2% |
12 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% | |
13 | HOOSHI Erica S. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% |
14 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
15 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
16 | XUE Alanna | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 1% | |
17 | WANG Ellen | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 47% | 19% |
18 | CHEN Kelly | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
19 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
20 | XU Madison | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
21 | CHEN Jessie S. | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
22 | YU Jaime L. | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
23 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 3% | 33% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
24 | HUANG Natalie | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - |
25 | DU Hannah | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
26 | HOLLE Aviella S. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
27 | SEO Irene Y. | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
28 | WEBB Ella | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
29 | CHEN Allison V. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
30 | LI Rachel Y. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
31 | YU Lauren C. | 14% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
32 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
33 | WU Julianna Y. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
34 | GU EMILY | 1% | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
35 | LIU Sophia | 3% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
36 | KANIUK Rachel | 2% | 29% | 41% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
37 | CHO Rebecca H. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
38 | FU Qihan | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
39 | SU Michelle | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | - |
40 | PAVE Claire | 4% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
41 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 16% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
42 | HEISER Anna M. | 17% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
43 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 22% | 43% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
44 | GUO Jessica | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
45 | SHEIN Evita | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
45 | ZGOMBIC Emily | 40% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
47 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.