Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CATLIN Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
2 | SOTO Ulises G | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
3 | PROUTY Nicholas C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
3 | KO Brian J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
5 | FUNK Theo S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
6 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
7 | KELLY Benjamin J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
8 | MOHAMMAD Abdulwahab | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
9 | DIVITO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
10 | FORTNER Lance R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
11 | NGUYEN Nish | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 34% | 6% |
12 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
13 | MORALES Ian N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
14 | FARQUHARSON Cole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 24% |
15 | KIM Aaron J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
16 | JORDON Kaleb W. | 100% | 93% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
17 | AMICO Julian F. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
18 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
19 | BARTEL Jacob L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
20 | WU Jerry Z. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
21 | LIM Charles Q. | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
22 | STIAGUN Nikita | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
23 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
24 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 12% |
25 | CHENG Matthew S. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
26 | URIBE Juan | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
27 | RYOU Aiden | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
28 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
29 | WOMACH Tristan | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
30 | MO Jason | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
31 | NAM Michael | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
32 | LUNA Emilio | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
33 | HARRIS Rhonen | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
33 | OLARU-HAGEN Eric | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
35 | DORMAN Patrick | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.