DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TIKHONOV Ilia | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 2 | CHEN Brian | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | RAFIDI Joseph (Joey) F. | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 3 | ADDYSON Aidan | V V D D V | V V V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 5 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 6 | GLOGOWSKI Konrad | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 7 | TIKHONOV Daniel | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 8 | GUO Benjamin | V D V D D | V V V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 9 | LIN Haley | V V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
| 10 | MIKHAIL Lucas | V V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 11 | YANG Gary | D V V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 12 | SUNKARA Vishnu | D D V V V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 13 | WHITE Myles | V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 14 | DELONG Mike | D V V D D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 15 | PAN Colin | D V D V D | V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 16 | CHRISTY Peter C. | V V D D D | V V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 17 | STRAFFORD Andrew | V V V V D V | D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
| 18 | ZHU Yiming | V D V V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 19 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | V D V D V V | D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 20 | SWICK Kerry J. | V V D V D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 21 | CHONG Eden | D V V V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 22 | HUGHES Michael D. | V D V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 23 | WHEELER Daniel | D D V V D V | D | 5.6 | 3 | -2.6 |
| 24 | CASH William Li | D D V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 25 | SWENSON Keane J. | D V D V D D | V D | 4.6 | 2 | -2.6 |
| 26 | MOLINA Rommel | D D D D V V | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 27 | GALIOTE James | V D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 28 | VELLALA Avinash | D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 29 | HITCHCOCK David | D V D D D | V D | 4.1 | 1 | -3.1 |
| 30 | MEGGERS Samuel | D D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 31 | QU RuiTing | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 32 | DAVIS Kai | D D V D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 33 | BROSNAN Solomon | V D D V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 34 | CHANEY Charles | D V D D V | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 | |
| 35 | ABU-AJAJ Mohamed | V D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 36 | ROBERTS Phoenix | D D V V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 37 | MAXWELL Sheito | D V D V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 38 | GORDON Hannah | D V V D D | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 39 | KENDLER Micah | D D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 40 | DOAN Christopher | D V D D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 41 | SHIN Jamie | D V D D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 42 | SCHREIBER Richard A. | D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 43 | PETROVSKI Kiril | V D D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 44 | BENAVIDES Samantha | V D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 45 | THOMPSON Josh | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.