Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHENG Matthew S. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
2 | KIM Aaron J. | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 14% | |
3 | WU Conrad J. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 1% |
3 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
5 | BARTEL Jacob L. | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
6 | VARGAS Bryan | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
7 | NGUYEN Nish | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
8 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
9 | KO Brian J. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 65% |
10 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
11 | DARIANO Noah G. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
12 | MORALES Ian N. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
13 | WU Jerry Z. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
14 | LEE David Y. | - | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | |
15 | KIM Banseok | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
16 | ALFARO Sergio Raul O. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
17 | OH Jonathan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 37% | 20% |
18 | LIM Charles Q. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
19 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 32% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
20 | WOMACH Tristan | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
21 | LI Ryan Z. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
22 | PIESNER Joshua C. | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% | |
23 | RYOU Aiden | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
24 | LI Avery Peihong | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
25 | AVRON Case B. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 2% |
26 | CHEN Bryce | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
27 | CHEN Wilson | 1% | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
28 | NAM Michael | 20% | 46% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
29 | RENTERIA Emiliano | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
30 | MO Jason | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
31 | KHER Roan | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
32 | FINNEY Lorenz | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
33 | KIM Derek A. | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | |
34 | WONG Louis | 53% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
35 | JI Evan | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
36 | CHEN Brian | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
37 | STIAGUN Nikita | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
38 | OLARU-HAGEN Eric | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
39 | DORMAN Patrick | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
40 | CHI Alexander | 21% | 46% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
41 | HARRIS Rhonen | 17% | 48% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
42 | SANTOS FINK Alex | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
43 | QIU Tengjie | 31% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
44 | NGUYEN Liam | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.