American Challenge RJCC/RYC

Junior Women's Foil

Sunday, April 19, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LEE Lavender 100% - - - - < 1% -
2 WANG YiXi 100% - - - - - < 1%
3 YANG Iris 100% - - - - < 1% -
3 FENG Grace 100% - - - - - < 1%
5 ROZPEDOWSKI Claire 100% - - - - - < 1%
6 KOPYLTSOVA Elizaveta 100% - - - - - < 1%
7 WANG Dina C. 100% - - - - < 1% -
8 DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) 100% - - - - < 1% -
9 TANG Melody Fujiao 100% - - - - - < 1%
10 WANG Joanna 100% - - - - < 1%
11 ORVANANOS Anice 100% - - - < 1% -
11 TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite 100% - - - - < 1% -
13 AL-BATTAINEH Eva 100% - - - - < 1% -
14 JIANG Chloe 100% - - - < 1% - -
15 XIE Su 100% - - - < 1% - -
16 ORBE-AUSTIN Nia 100% - - - < 1% - -
17 LI Han (Helina) 100% - - - - - < 1%
18 LIU Angel(Daying) 100% - - - - < 1% -
19 CHEN Renee 100% - - - - < 1% -
20 PEVZNER Nicole 100% - - - - < 1% -
21 JOO Natalie 100% - - - - < 1% -
21 KRAHE Annika 100% - - - - < 1% -
23 LIU Qianchen E. 100% - - - - < 1% -
24 YU Jane 100% - - - - < 1% -
25 KIM Claire 100% - - - < 1% -
26 BING Charlotte 100% - - - < 1% -
27 FENG Audrey 100% - - - < 1% - -
28 ORRINGER Lottie 100% - - - < 1% - -
29 CAO Amelie 100% - - - < 1% - -
30 SHENG Katherine 100% - - - < 1% - -
31 ZELDIN Nadia 100% - - - < 1% - -
32 MURPHY Genevieve 100% - < 1% - - -
33 WANG Amabel 100% - - - - - < 1%
34 SHIN Elizabeth 100% - - - - < 1% -
35 MCFARLANE Asha 100% - - - - < 1% -
36 LI Christina 100% - - - - < 1% -
37 HARRIS Parker 100% - - - < 1% - -
38 DIMATULAC Elise Ann 100% - - - < 1% - -
39 KAPRAN Anastasia 100% - - - < 1% - -
41 REZA Fukaina 100% - - - < 1% - -
41 SUN Erin 100% - - - < 1% - -
41 STEWART Isla 100% - - - < 1% - -
44 SHA Yi Ling 100% - - < 1% - -
45 ZHANG Vivian 100% - - < 1% - - -
46 FIELD Elizabeth 100% - - < 1% - - -
47 HUSSIAN Annabelle 100% - - < 1% - - -
48 SHIM Grace J. 100% - - < 1% - - -
49 LI Joy 100% - - < 1% - - -
50 KUANG Bella 100% - - < 1% - - -
51 DONG Iris 100% - - < 1% - - -
52 HUANG Sophie 100% - < 1% - - -
53 HOLLIS Priscillia 100% - < 1% - - - -
54 GUAN Adeline 100% - < 1% - - - -
55 BERTOLINI Mia 100% - < 1% - - - -
56 SHMAY Anastasia 100% - < 1% - - - -
57 LI Savannah 100% - < 1% - - - -
58 IWERSEN Marte 100% - < 1% - - - -
59 WEN Cynthia 100% < 1% - - - -
60 ZHU Ella 100% - < 1% - - - -
61 LI Katerina 100% < 1% - - - -
62 LI Junhan 100% < 1% - - - - -
63 ZHANG Priscilla 100% < 1% - - - - -
64 LAVINE Samantha 100% < 1% - - - - -
65 SFINTESCU Emma 100% - - < 1% - - -
66 SON Ayoung 100% - - < 1% - - -
67 PHAN Logan 100% - - < 1% - - -
68 DE CASTRO Kai 100% - < 1% - - - -
69 BADLANI Diya 100% - < 1% - - -
70 FEDER Acadia 100% - < 1% - - - -
71 POWLEDGE Cora 100% - < 1% - - - -
72 PRINZ-STRATEMAN Matilda 100% - < 1% - - - -
73 LIN Katherine 100% - < 1% - - - -
74 BASILE Gianna 100% - < 1% - - - -
75 CAVANAGH Emma 100% - < 1% - - - -
76 GOMEZ Sofia 100% - < 1% - - -
77 LAZAR Carolina 100% < 1% - - - - -
78 MANGLANI Maya 100% < 1% - - - - -
79 LEO Jenna 100% < 1% - - - - -
80 WU Maggie Lei 100% < 1% - - - - -
81 FIELD Julianna 100% < 1% - - - - -
82 LIU Caydence 100% < 1% - - - - -
83 HAFEZ Sahar 100% < 1% - - - - -
84 UHRICH Reese 100% < 1% - - - - -
85 BAULIN Zoya 100% < 1% - - - - -
86 SNYDERS Evelyn 100% < 1% - - - - -
87 CULLEN Alyssa 100% < 1% - - - - -
88 MA Emily(Yiming) 100% < 1% - - - - -
89 LENZ Phoebe 100% < 1% - - - - -
90 ZINITI-LAU Elena 100% - - - - - -
91 LIU Yinuo 100% - - - - - -
92 ALBRECHT-SMITH Anne 100% - - - - - -
93 PEVZNER Sophia 100% - - - - -
94 SOROUR Amira 100% - - - - - -
95 ZHANG Caroline 100% - - - - - -
96 OTTERMAN Jenna 100% - - - - - -
97 KUI Ava 100% - - - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.