Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACKAY Katherine | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 47% |
| 2 | JOHN Sophia | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
| 3 | IANNUZZI Lucy | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 3 | KWON Ava | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
| 5 | LEE Alyson | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
| 6 | DAMBAL Sasha | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 7 | WANG JiaQi | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 8 | CHAU Zoey | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 9 | HUANG Pierra | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 10 | GUGALA Hanna | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 11 | NIU Jessica | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 12 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 48% | 18% |
| 13 | LIU Chelsea | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 14 | KANG Soeun | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 36% | 6% |
| 15 | KATZ Emma | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 16 | FOSS Persephone | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 17 | HU Alicia | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 18 | ZHANG Nikki | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | < 1% |
| 19 | ZHANG Audrey | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | < 1% |
| 20 | GOEL Lineysha | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 21 | DEMRY Kylee | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 22 | ZHANG Wuxin | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 22 | LI Tira | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
| 24 | XU Elaine | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 25% | |
| 25 | DUTA Lyra | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 26 | DANIELS Jordanna | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | WANG MONA | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
| 28 | LI Tiffany | - | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% |
| 29 | CAFAGNA Sofia | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
| 30 | PATEL Maia | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | UZAR Julianna | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 32 | TIAN Ariana | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | CHOWDHERY Myra | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 34 | CHANG Norah | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 35 | SUN Yi | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% |
| 36 | BORGUETA Madison | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% |
| 37 | KAYA Lara | - | 4% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | JIANG Yutong | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 39 | ZONG Eliane | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 40 | PARK Haylie | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 7% |
| 41 | LI Yuluo | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 42 | WONG Charlene | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 43 | CHEN Chloe | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 44 | ZHENG Winona | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
| 45 | TASSONE Charlie | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 46 | VATS Ishita | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 47 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 48 | MULLER Inara | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 49 | ZHOU Claire | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | NEMORIN Rei | - | 1% | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
| 51 | SEO Kaitlyn | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 52 | MOTOVA Masha | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 53 | FAZAL Sasha | 7% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 54 | LAFFY Lily | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 6% |
| 55 | SHI Chuqing | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 56 | KIM Grace | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 57 | WANG Chloe | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 58 | ILAGAN Ava | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 59 | HILD Anya | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 60 | YANG Selina | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 61 | NG Sophia | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 62 | CANARAN Daphne M. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 63 | VALTCHEV Anne | 14% | 55% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 64 | BERRIOS Catalina | < 1% | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 65 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 66 | IORDANOVA Vela | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 67 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 68 | LEE Grace | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 69 | LEE Kaitlin | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 69 | WU Harper | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 71 | HUANG Zoe | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 72 | KIM Jodie | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 73 | AN Jamie | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 74 | LIU Stephanie | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 75 | YIN Xizi | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 76 | LEON Malolae | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 77 | VARAH Alaia | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 78 | LAU Angela | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 79 | HU Sophia | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 80 | SU JOSERINE | 7% | 32% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 81 | ZHANG Ashley | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 24% | 4% |
| 81 | ZHANG Emily | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 83 | MADDISON Erica | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | LIAO Audrey | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | BUCCINO Sloane | 27% | 48% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 86 | MADDISON Estelle | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 87 | HO Sophia | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 88 | MUNSHI Ridhima | 6% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 89 | KIM Irene | 2% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 90 | FANG Elena | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 91 | CHEN Victoria | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 92 | LIU Alyssa | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 93 | ONO Lisa | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 94 | KANG Ellie | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 95 | DOROBANTU Emma | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 96 | GU Allison | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 97 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 97 | LEE Jiyoung | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 99 | JIANG Juliette | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 100 | DILALLO Olivia | 21% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 101 | LIU Sophia | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 102 | AN Angel | 32% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 103 | GONZALEZ Alexis | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 104 | LIU Teresa | 7% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 105 | HAROYAN Lilit | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 106 | PARAISO Isabella | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 107 | BIESIADA Sophia | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 107 | DATLA Aanya | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 109 | AWASTHI Tisha | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 110 | LIAO Amber | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 111 | MARGULIS Roxana | 22% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.