Rain City Fencing Center - Bellevue, WA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KENSICKI Phoebe | - | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% |
| 2 | DESAI Zoya | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 28% |
| 3 | WANG Doreen | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
| 3 | JIANG Ziqing | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 36% | |
| 5 | LEE Zoe E. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 38% | 57% |
| 6 | ESAKI Kei | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 7 | GOWDA Siyona | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 8 | CHUNG Katie | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
| 9 | LU Keeva | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
| 10 | KIM Ines | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 11 | SAIFEE Zahra | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 55% | 22% |
| 12 | FU Joy | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 13 | DEJOY Leilah | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | LIN Avery | - | - | 6% | 27% | 46% | 21% | |
| 15 | KIM Audrey | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
| 16 | KIM Ellen | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 17 | LIU Anya | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 18 | SAIFEE Sakina | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 41% | 9% |
| 19 | KIM Rylie | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 7% | |
| 20 | QIAO Lori-Ann | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 21 | WU Gloria | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 22 | NAKAZATO Olivia | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% | - |
| 23 | LIN Tiffany | 8% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | KIM Olivia | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 25 | DONG Nancy | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 26 | FU Angela | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 27 | YOUN Davina | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 28 | TATINENI Charvi | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | HOM Emma | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
| 30 | CHEN Bridgette | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 12% | |
| 31 | NAKAZATO Isabella | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 32 | SHU Kayla | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | ZHANG Selene T. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 3% | |
| 34 | ZHU Claire | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 35 | MAHAPATRA Alisha | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 36 | WU Allison | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 37 | JIANG Ziqi | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | CHEN Aimee | - | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 39 | ZHANG Annabelle | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 40 | PENG Yuewei | 16% | 53% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 41 | TANG Ming-Hao Audrey | 37% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | SHI Cathy | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 43 | FITCH Abigail | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 44 | CHEN Chloe | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | TUNG Alison | 4% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 46 | ZHENG Joanna | 7% | 31% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | HOLSTAD Anneliese | - | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 48 | LI Hoi lam hanna | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 49 | CHAI Aria | 2% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 50 | MORENO Alexsis | 8% | 28% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | LIU Doris-Zihan Zhou | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 51 | CHEN Michelle | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 53 | SUN Zoey | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | SCHULTZ Emmi | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 55 | LAI Olivia | 12% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | JIANG Katherine | 11% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | PENG Yuerui | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | KUO Liang-Jun | 13% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | YANG Lucy | 63% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 60 | HEWES Sierra | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 61 | DONG Ena | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.