Greater Richmond Convention Center - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | OXENREIDER Tierna A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% |
| 2 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% |
| 3 | NIXON Catherine (Kasia) D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% |
| 3 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% |
| 5 | CHIN Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 26% |
| 5 | LIU Charlene (Kai) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 32% |
| 7 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% |
| 8 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 9 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 20% |
| 10 | PROFIS Liora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 12% |
| 11 | TOBY Natalia R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 37% |
| 12 | WANG Karen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 22% |
| 13 | YOUNG VIVIAN | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
| 14 | GUO Luxi | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | QI Julieanne | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | - |
| 16 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 64% | 10% |
| 17 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 33% |
| 18 | CHI Chelsea | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 8% |
| 19 | HANKINS Morgan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | - |
| 20 | SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 21 | WANG Ziqi (yoyo) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 54% | 13% | 1% |
| 22 | NEMETH Katherine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | BECKMAN Ana | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 24 | YILMAZ Pinar | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
| 25 | VAN BRUMMEN Anna C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 26 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% |
| 27 | GOH Cayla | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 28 | AZMEH nour | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 29 | LEE Sumin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 19% |
| 30 | MARX Leslie M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 9% |
| 31 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | YAO Melinda | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 5% |
| 33 | KETKAR Ketki | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 68% |
| 34 | RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
| 35 | LEE Scarlett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 36 | KUNJAN Lena R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 29% | 4% |
| 37 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 38 | HURLEY Courtney L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 59% |
| 38 | NIXON Caroline (Karolina) L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 34% |
| 40 | WANG Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 41 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoria | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 42 | LEE REGINA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 43 | SHEFFIELD Lake Mawu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 8% |
| 44 | PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 38% |
| 45 | SHIV Avni | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 7% |
| 46 | CHERNIS Liah | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 47 | EDWARDS Auprell | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 48 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | 2% |
| 49 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 15% | |
| 50 | TOLSMA Chloe | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
| 51 | SEREGIN Katya | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 52 | WU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
| 53 | CARRIER Meredith | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 54 | FENG Ge (Catherine) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
| 55 | WANG Jessie | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 56 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 57 | PILSON Rebecca | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | GANSER Nicole | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 59 | LEE Claire | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 60 | ILYAS Ayah | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 61 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 61 | ADYANTHAYA Anika | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 63 | XIONG Angelica | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 64 | BEATIE Isabella M. | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | LIN Jessica Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% |
| 66 | ANEZIOKORO Zahra | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 67 | WU Jessica | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 68 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 48% | 8% |
| 69 | LEE Michelle J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 20% |
| 70 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
| 71 | LISCUM Vivian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | - |
| 72 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% | |
| 73 | BASRALIAN Azniv | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 74 | CAMAMA Tessa | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 75 | WATRALL Christina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
| 76 | HERNASA Anna | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 77 | FRANGER Macy | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 78 | CHOY LeeAnn | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 79 | ELSTON Sophie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 2% | - |
| 80 | KANASKAR Ila | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 81 | BEAVER Ava | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 82 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 3% | |
| 83 | LI Caroline | 100% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 84 | LEE Gloria Y. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 85 | MAI Mailan | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 86 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 87 | MILEWSKI Nicole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 88 | BALAKRISHNAN Trisha | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 89 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% | 3% |
| 90 | HAUSHEER Kuncen | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 91 | SHAYAKHMETOVA Suzanna | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 92 | BATES Cassandra L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 47% |
| 92 | KAUR Manroop | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 94 | SONG Angela | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 95 | LI Fei | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 17% | 1% | - |
| 96 | STERR Isabella M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 97 | STERN Savannah | 100% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 98 | HABEK Sophia | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 99 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 100 | PECK Maia A. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 101 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 100% | 98% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 102 | OLELE Ifechi | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 103 | SCHMITT Harper | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 104 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 105 | WANG Sophie Y. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
| 105 | MOLLINIER Angel | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 107 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 107 | ZHUANG Lauren | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 107 | CHI Zoe | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 110 | RICHARDS Axelle | 100% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 111 | IYER Ishana | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 111 | SUN Karolyn | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 113 | MCQUEEN Morgan | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 114 | MCGLADE Jasmine | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 114 | LEE Yeriel | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 116 | WEI Sherry | 100% | 88% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 117 | GAN Shelby | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 118 | LEE Emily | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 119 | BOROTKO Katerina | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 120 | SALISTRA Emilia | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 121 | BURT Emmalyne Grace | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 122 | DHAIYA Tanya | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 123 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 124 | ABUELFUTUH Sama | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 125 | MENDOZA zoie | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 126 | MARTINEZ Christina | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 127 | ZHAN Clare | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 128 | BUSH emma | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 129 | WANG Cecilia | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 130 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 131 | WONG Sydney | 100% | 75% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 132 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 133 | LAW Mila | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 134 | BISONO Valentina | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 135 | ZHAO Alina | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 136 | PETROFF Eva | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 137 | PRESMAN Aerin | 100% | 94% | 64% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 138 | NORCONK Claire R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | - |
| 139 | NING Miranda | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 139 | XU Emily (Hua) | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 141 | FENG Iris | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 142 | GIERAT-KATZ Izabella | 100% | 78% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 143 | SHEFFIELD Skye | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 144 | HOLDEN Helena | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 145 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 98% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 146 | KUDRYAVTSEVA Margarita | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 147 | CHEN Ava | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 148 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 149 | KROPP Anne (Charlie) | 100% | 84% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 150 | LIN Isabel | 100% | 93% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.