Indianapolis Fencing Club - Noblesville, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KENT Dwain | - | - | 2% | 24% | 52% | 22% | |
| 2 | THOMAS Samuel | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 3 | GERACI Paul A. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 26% |
| 3 | RIPLEY Ian | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% |
| 5 | DUARTE NAPOLES Alexander Lazaro | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 47% | 35% |
| 6 | HAGGARD Dominic | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 36% | |
| 7 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | - | - | 6% | 36% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 8 | RICE Britton | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | KRAVCENKO Nikita | - | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% |
| 10 | GUILFORD Corey | - | - | 10% | 40% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 11 | ANDERSON Noah | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 12 | STAUBITZ Marc | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 13 | TURNER Joshua | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 44% | 17% |
| 14 | PRIJATEL John R. | - | - | 7% | 45% | 39% | 9% | |
| 15 | FAENOVA Alexandra | 1% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 16 | YANG Leo | - | 9% | 56% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 17 | ZALPURI Zorin | - | 10% | 44% | 38% | 7% | - | - |
| 18 | MCNARY Ross | - | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 19 | MYERS Lewis | 7% | 41% | 45% | 6% | - | - | |
| 20 | PETTIJOHN Luke | 1% | 26% | 45% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 21 | NOSKO zachary | 23% | 68% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
| 22 | BOLIG Emma | 43% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 23 | CLARKE Calix | 18% | 49% | 30% | 3% | - | - | |
| 24 | WILTSHIRE Kaden | 1% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 25 | ANGELIDES Gabrielle | 42% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 26 | DUTTON Kimberly | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 26 | HILL Jasmyn | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.