2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | 2021-2022 | Before 2021 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Victories | 14 | 3 | - | - | - | 17 |
Losses | 18 | 5 | - | - | - | 23 |
Win Ratio | 43.8% | 37.5% | - | - | - | 42.5% |
Pool Victories | 10 | 2 | - | - | - | 12 |
Pool Losses | 13 | 4 | - | - | - | 17 |
Pool Win Ratio | 43.5% | 33.3% | - | - | - | 41.4% |
DE Victories | 4 | 1 | - | - | - | 5 |
DE Losses | 5 | 1 | - | - | - | 6 |
DE Win Ratio | 44.4% | 50.0% | - | - | - | 45.5% |
Note: Seasons start on August 1st and end on July 31st.
2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | 2021-2022 | Before 2021 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Easy wins† | 4 | - | - | - | - | 4 |
Easy wins as % of wins | 28.6% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 23.5% |
Close wins‡ | 4 | 2 | - | - | - | 6 |
Close wins as % of all wins | 28.6% | 66.7% | - | - | - | 35.3% |
Close losses‡ | 4 | - | - | - | - | 4 |
Close losses as % of all losses | 22.2% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 17.4% |
Big losses† | 5 | 2 | - | - | - | 7 |
Big losses as % of all losses | 27.8% | 40.0% | - | - | - | 30.4% |
† Easy victories or big losses are those with the score difference of 4 or more touches in a pool, 7 or
more touches in direct elimination, and 5 or more in veteran and youth direct elimination.
‡ Close bouts are those with the score difference of 1 or fewer touches in a pool, 3 or
fewer touches in direct elimination, or 2 or fewer touches in veteran or youth direct elimination.
2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | 2021-2022 | Before 2021 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Victories | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Victories as % of all victories | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 0.0% |
Losses | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
Losses as % of all losses | 5.6% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 4.3% |
Total | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
Total as % of all bouts | 3.1% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 2.5% |
2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | 2021-2022 | Before 2021 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Events | 5 | 1 | - | - | - | 6 |
Tournaments | 4 | 1 | - | - | - | 5 |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 2:5 | LARSON Vaughn | 17 | U | 13 | Grand Rapids Fencing Academy | 1501 | 1435 | 48.3 | 46% | ||
Pool | L | 4:5 | CHEN Isaac Zhi | 2 | 112 | E24 | 2 | 1610 | 1387 | 36.5 | 36% | ||
Pool | W | 5:2 | CAMP William | 25 | U | 18 | Hooked On Fencing | 1120 | 1350 | 34.2 | 64% | ||
Pool | W | 5:2 | HURLEY Michael | 14 | U | 17 | Windy City Fencing-Chicago | 865 | 1385 | 19.9 | 79% | ||
Pool | L | 0:5 | HANTOV Adrian | 8 | U | 20 | Windy City Fencing-Chicago | 1272 | 1404 | 51.1 | 58% | ||
T32 | W | 15:7 | CAMP William | 25 | U | 18 | Hooked On Fencing | 1705 | 1704 | 120.7 | 50% | ||
T16 | L | 3:15 | BAGDONAS Olivier | 5 | E24 | 1 | Windy City Fencing-Chicago | 1647 | 1825 | 130.9 | 60% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | W | 5:4 | ANGELIDES Gabrielle | 7 | U | 10 | Purdue Fencing Club-purdue Univ. | ||||||
Pool | L | 3:5 | MACNEIL Matthew | 3 | C23 | 3 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1791 | 1254 | 29.1 | 20% | ||
Pool | W | 5:4 | BOYER Kai | 2 | C24 | 7 | Purdue Fencing Club-purdue Univ. | 2188 | 1224 | 136.2 | 8% | ||
Pool | W | 5:3 | REEN Stephen | 6 | E24 | 2 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1504 | 1361 | 67.7 | 41% | ||
Pool | W | 5:3 | YANG Junhu | 10 | U | 11 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 337 | 1428 | 6.7 | 95% | ||
T8 | L | 9:15 | REEN Stephen | 6 | E24 | 2 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1824 | 1846 | 142.4 | 51% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 4:5 | MACNEIL Matthew | 9 | C23 | 8 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1721 | 1426 | 57.5 | 33% | ||
Pool | L | 3:5 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | 6 | C24 | 2 | NKY Fencing Academy (NKFA) / Hudson Centers for the Martial Arts | 2047 | 1368 | 27.0 | 15% | ||
Pool | L | 0:5 | MOHOV Aleksey | 1 | B24 | 3 | Purdue Fencing Club-purdue Univ. | 2627 | 1341 | 5.8 | 3% | ||
Pool | L | 1:5 | MILLER Brent | 17 | E23 | 12 | Bloomington Fencing Club | 1766 | 1336 | 39.8 | 25% | ||
Pool | L | 3:4 | METZ Evan | 15 | E24 | 20 | Miami University Fencing Ohio | 1611 | 1296 | 42.2 | 33% | ||
Pool | W | 5:2 | DUTTON Kimberly | 24 | U | 26 | |||||||
T32 | L | 9:15 | MILLER Hayden | 13 | E24 | 3 | Bloomington Fencing Club | 1811 | 2047 | 200.2 | 62% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | W | 5:1 | YANG Junhu | 10 | U | 12 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 523 | 1406 | 28.9 | 88% | ||
Pool | L | 2:5 | MCNARY Ross | 15 | U | 2 | Louisville Fencing Center, Inc. | 1364 | 1435 | 117.3 | 54% | ||
Pool | W | 5:4 | STEVENS Connor | 7 | U | 1 | 1498 | 1318 | 108.1 | 40% | |||
T16 | W | 15:3 | YANG Junhu | 10 | U | 12 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1684 | 1983 | 168.4 | 63% | ||
T8 | W | 15:7 | GROVES Isaac | 9 | U | 6 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1461 | 2151 | 89.9 | 81% | ||
T4 | L | 14:15 | STEVENS Connor | 7 | U | 1 | 2076 | 2241 | 194.7 | 58% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 2:5 | MILLER Owen | 21 | U | 2 | Purdue Fencing Club-purdue Univ. / North Shore Fencers Club | 1203 | 1730 | 241.1 | 74% | ||
Pool | L | 2:5 | MACNEIL Matthew | 5 | C23 | 8 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1779 | 1489 | 103.5 | 34% | ||
Pool | L | 2:5 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | 4 | C24 | 6 | Salle des Lutins | 2320 | 1386 | 28.6 | 9% | ||
Pool | W | 5:2 | GROVES Isaac | 12 | U | 22 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 724 | 1357 | 48.9 | 82% | ||
T32 | W | 15:13 | STAUBITZ Marc | 6 | D24 | 19 | 1393 | 1873 | 227.8 | 70% | |||
T16 | L | 5:15 | MOHOV Aleksey | 1 | B24 | 1 | Purdue Fencing Club-purdue Univ. | 2863 | 2101 | 118.1 | 19% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 2:5 | HAUCK Samuel J. | 5 | C24 | 5 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 2081 | 2500 | 699.0 | 65% | ||
Pool | L | 3:5 | MACNEIL Sydney | 11 | E24 | 17 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | ||||||
Pool | W | 5:4 | STAUBITZ Marc | 8 | D24 | 16 | 1409 | 1801 | 239.0 | 68% | |||
Pool | W | 5:3 | FARRER Brennecke E | 19 | U | 10 | 1151 | 2040 | 87.8 | 86% | |||
Pool | L | 0:5 | BECKER Thomas | 2 | B24 | 2 | Ann Arbor Dueling Society | 2791 | 2128 | 106.7 | 20% | ||
Pool | L | 3:5 | STEVENS Connor | 14 | U | 12 | 1487 | 2021 | 290.8 | 73% | |||
T32 | W | 15:13 | WANG Ellie | 16 | U | 19 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | ||||||
T16 | L | 0:15 | MOHOV Aleksey | 6 | C23 | 1 | Purdue Fencing Club-purdue Univ. | 2189 | 2500 | 626.7 | 61% |