Greater Richmond Convention Center - Richmond, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | PAI Dong-Ying | V V V D V V | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 2 | GONZALEZ II John L. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | FULTON Rick A. Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | HABALA Peter | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.8 | 5 | -0.8 |
| 5 | WOOD Alexander W. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 6 | GREEN Michael C. | V V V V D V | V V V | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 8 | KREIDMAN Michael J. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 9 | WILLIAMS Kenneth H. | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 10 | POPOKH Leo | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 11 | FLANAGAN James | V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 12 | BALESTRACCI CHRIS | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 13 | KUZMAK Michael J. | V V V V D V | V V | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 14 | BALBOA Rolando M. | D V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 15 | JUNCO Carlos | D V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 16 | CLAYTON Byron | D D V D V D | V V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 17 | LOPEZ Reynaldo (REY) | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 18 | CHO Michael | V V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 19 | KOSLA Anthony M. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 20 | SHEYNKMAN Leon | V D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 21 | RIFFATERRE Jason | V V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 22 | NICHOLSON II Michael A. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 23 | HENNIG Thomas A. | V D V V V D | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 24 | CHERNOMASHENTSEV Alan | V V D D V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 25 | TOMASI John | V V V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 26 | REARDON Patrick M. | D V V D V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 27 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | V D V D V | V | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 28 | POWERS Douglas A. | V V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 29 | VALENTINE Iain | V V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 30 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | V D V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 31 | DE BARROS CONTI Thibaut | V V D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 32 | LEE Hans | V D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 33 | KISSINGFORD John F. | V D V V V V | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 34 | CHAN Geoffrey | D V V V V V | D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
| 35 | PAVLOVICH Robert | V D D V V V | D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 36 | JOHANSON David B. | D D V V V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 37 | RUSANOV Oleg | D V V V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 38 | LEBLANC Gerald (Jerry) A. | D V V V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 39 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | V D V D V | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 40 | LAWRENCE John W. | D V D D V V | 5.5 | 3 | -2.5 | |
| 41 | HAYENGA Gary M. | V V D D V D | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 42 | BUCHNER William | V D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 43 | DRAKE David L. | D V V D V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 44 | BHATT Jay | D V D V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 45 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | D V D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 46 | SVIHL Dale | V D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 47 | SUCHOSKI Annika | D D V D V | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 48 | VOYIAZIAKIS Emanuel | D D D V D V | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 49 | WOOD BEn | V D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 50 | WILBERT Matt | D V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 51 | HOLCOMB Michael | V D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 52 | PRECCIOZZI Aldo F. | D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 53 | NEWELL Tim | V D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 54 | BERBERI Matt | D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 55 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 56 | LESNIAK Chuck | D D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 57 | GARDNER William | D D V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 58 | ZEISS Gary M. | D D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 59 | ROUNTREE Andrew | D D V D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 60 | TOLENTINO SR. Francis | D D V D D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 61 | CARTER Austin L. | D D D D D V | V | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 62 | NUDELMAN Aleksandr | D D D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 63 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 64 | HILL David E. | D D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 65 | SMITH IV Edward (Ted) A. | V D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 66 | JEFFCOAT Timothy | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 67 | ZAIDI Sohail | D V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 68 | GLADNICK Michael J. | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 69 | DOVER Felix | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 70 | SESSIONS Adrian | D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 71 | MAZZA DDS Daniel (Dan) G. | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 72 | BOTWINICK Nelson G. | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 73 | CORNELIUS Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.