Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUNDBORG Mark R. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
| 2 | BECKER William L. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% |
| 3 | DASHNAW Stephen | - | - | 2% | 23% | 47% | 25% | 3% |
| 3 | BACON Michael F. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 49% | 23% |
| 5 | MATT Chris | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 6 | HECK Steven D. | - | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | < 1% |
| 7 | KIZIK Val | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 8 | KOPYLOV Dmitri | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 9 | THORNTON Ronald J. | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 49% | 9% |
| 9 | MONTORIO Louis V. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 41% | 12% |
| 11 | MIRONOVAS Mikhail (Misha) | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 47% | 37% |
| 12 | VIDOVSZKY Tamas J. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 59% |
| 13 | NAZLYMOV Vitali V. | - | - | - | 7% | 30% | 43% | 19% |
| 14 | NEVEROVICH Vitaly V. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 15 | BOYLAN John R. | 1% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 16 | DOLEGIEWICZ Mariusz | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 17 | FAINGOLD Vladimir | 1% | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 17 | LUKIBANOV Oleg | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 19 | ZIPPER Michael E. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | CHU Kevin | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 21 | ESCUETA Jr Antonio V. | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 22 | KEEFER Philip E. | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | GORMLEY Peter J. | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | GRANDBOIS Peter R. | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 25 | FRIEDBERG John M. | 2% | 26% | 44% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | MARTINEZ Mario D. | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | LILLARD Samuel N. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | POND III George E. | 11% | 40% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | TANNAS Henri | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 30 | MARGIL David | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 31 | BUKOWSKI Todd | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | ELDER John | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | RABINOWITZ Mike | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 34 | MEHTA Nalin J. | 43% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | DOBBINS James W. | 1% | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 36 | ZINNI Gene | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 37 | HUANG Erich | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 38 | PINCUS Gary J. | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | PREUD'HOMME Xavier A. | 58% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | YU Limin | 13% | 54% | 31% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 42 | RAMIREZ Joselito | 5% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.