Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LUNDBORG Mark R. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 2 | BECKER William L. | V V V V D D | V V V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
| 3 | DASHNAW Stephen | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 3 | BACON Michael F. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 5 | MATT Chris | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 6 | HECK Steven D. | V V V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 6 | +3.1 |
| 7 | KIZIK Val | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 8 | KOPYLOV Dmitri | V V D V D V | V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 9 | THORNTON Ronald J. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 9 | MONTORIO Louis V. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 11 | MIRONOVAS Mikhail (Misha) | V D V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 12 | VIDOVSZKY Tamas J. | D V V V V V | V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 13 | NAZLYMOV Vitali V. | V V V D V D | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 14 | NEVEROVICH Vitaly V. | D D V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 15 | BOYLAN John R. | D V V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 16 | DOLEGIEWICZ Mariusz | V V D D D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 17 | FAINGOLD Vladimir | V V D V V D | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 17 | LUKIBANOV Oleg | D D V V V V | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 19 | ZIPPER Michael E. | D V V V D D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 20 | CHU Kevin | V D D V V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 21 | ESCUETA Jr Antonio V. | V D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 22 | KEEFER Philip E. | D D V D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 23 | GORMLEY Peter J. | D V D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 24 | GRANDBOIS Peter R. | V D V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 25 | FRIEDBERG John M. | V D D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 26 | MARTINEZ Mario D. | D D D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | LILLARD Samuel N. | D V D D V D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 28 | POND III George E. | D D V D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 29 | TANNAS Henri | D D D V D D | V D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 30 | MARGIL David | D D D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 31 | BUKOWSKI Todd | V D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 32 | ELDER John | D D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 33 | RABINOWITZ Mike | V D V D D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 34 | MEHTA Nalin J. | V D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 35 | DOBBINS James W. | D V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 36 | ZINNI Gene | D D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 37 | HUANG Erich | D V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 38 | PINCUS Gary J. | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 40 | PREUD'HOMME Xavier A. | D D D D D V | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 41 | YU Limin | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 42 | RAMIREZ Joselito | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.