Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RUNYAN Joshua | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 50% | 31% |
2 | WRIGHT Lloyd G. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
3 | BADGER Carlton (Carl) M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 44% | 15% |
3 | KASTOR Jacaeber | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 45% | 27% |
5 | STREB Joseph S. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
6 | GUEBLE Jeffrey R. | - | - | 4% | 29% | 61% | 6% | |
7 | SEUSS C. David | - | - | - | - | 13% | 86% | |
8 | LEAR Donald W. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
9 | ANTHONY Jr Donald K. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
9 | PARAGANO Vincent | - | 2% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 8% | - |
11 | MYERS Brent M. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 4% |
12 | SRERE Mark A. | - | 4% | 35% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - |
13 | BLAIR III Ray H. | 7% | 37% | 42% | 14% | 1% | - | |
14 | HICHA Paul R. | - | 3% | 25% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - |
15 | BAKER Keith L. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
16 | BREES Roger | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
17 | LIBERS Alexander M. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
18 | ROSENTHAL Paul E. | - | 7% | 32% | 47% | 13% | - | |
19 | KATH Philip (Doc) D. | 6% | 36% | 44% | 14% | 1% | - | |
20 | MCLAUGHLIN Joseph R. | 14% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
21 | SZATHMARY Michael J. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
22 | YAN Peter C. | 24% | 47% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
23 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 16% | 61% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
24 | FRUNGILLO Benjamin | 75% | 25% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
25 | THORNTON Michael (Mike) G. | 61% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | |
26 | SHORT Skip | 46% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
27 | SAFAI Tejav | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.