Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HARLEY Colby A. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 2 | DANNULL Lukas J. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 9% |
| 3 | HARVEY Nicholas J. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | |
| 3 | HEATHCOCK Colin Yang Siqi | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 5 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 6 | DENNER Lysander H. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 6 | LIM Ryan Y. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 8 | JEFFORDS Alexander | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
| 9 | HONG Marshall Q. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 10 | LILOV Neil | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% |
| 11 | KUSHKOV Simon O. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 22% |
| 12 | ANGLADE Junior Ronald (RJ) E. | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 13 | LIMB Matthew G. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 32% |
| 14 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 15 | LAI Adam J. | - | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% |
| 16 | PAN Jack (Yuxiang) | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
| 17 | KIM Avery J. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 18 | VASILYEV Nikita K. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 19 | FRISHMAN Ethan J. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 20 | GEFELL Andrew P. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 21 | BOLTON Braydon A. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 22 | CHANG Eliot A. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 22 | KIM Minwook | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 26% |
| 24 | JI Cody Walter | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 25 | ZHOU Matthew R. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 26 | MORREALE John | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 27 | HAMMER Peter A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 28 | KIM Sean G. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 29 | YANG Ziyi | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 30 | DHINGRA Gian K. | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 31 | CHAN Matthew | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 32 | PEDERSEN Leif | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 33 | DODRILL Grant | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 45% | 26% |
| 34 | LIANG Connor | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 35 | ZHOU Justin | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 36 | LEE Kyle | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 37 | WOOD Elden S. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 38 | SO Hananiah | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
| 39 | CHEN Oscar | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 40 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
| 41 | CHO Brandon | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
| 42 | LIN Nick | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
| 43 | FORMAN Logan | 2% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 44 | WILSON Jude | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 45 | HUSSAIN Faaris | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 46 | YAO Jonathan | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 47 | TANG Albert | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 48 | LIN John A. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 49 | DROZ Camden J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 27% |
| 50 | CAI Lawrence (Larry) | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 28% |
| 51 | HARRIS Alex K. | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 52 | NG Jonathan H. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 9% |
| 53 | BARBER William S. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 54 | LUEBBE Macklan C | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 55 | FLORES Peter D. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 56 | JEAN Noe T. | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 57 | LASORSA Matthew | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 58 | TANG Alex Y. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 59 | RAI Avin | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 60 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 61 | LUKASHENKO Darii | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 62 | BAILEY Asher | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 63 | BERGER Oliver | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 64 | YEN Preston | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 4% |
| 65 | YANG Kevin S. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
| 66 | AURAY Phileas | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 67 | OWENS William | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% | |
| 68 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 69 | NI AMEN Zahir K. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 36% | 13% |
| 70 | CHAYEVSKY Kirk | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 70 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 70 | SAKHAMURI Surya | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 73 | LO Joshua H. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 74 | SHI Andrew | - | 1% | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% |
| 75 | LE Hayden | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 76 | CHEN Brian | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 77 | KUSHKOV Veniamin | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 78 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 79 | SOHN Kevin J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
| 80 | PAN Andrew W. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 81 | BLINKOV Andrey | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 81 | TRAVERS Samir T. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 83 | RAJA Arnav | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 84 | LEMPERT Levy A. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 85 | DILLREE Spencer S. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 86 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 86 | LEVIN Mark A. | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 88 | LIU David J. | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 89 | WIND Nicky E. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 90 | DU Gavin J. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 91 | LIU Jonathan M. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 92 | LEONARD Cole | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 93 | GREEN IV James (Bud) | - | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 94 | WANG Eric Y. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 95 | BUEKER Samuel P. | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 96 | CHANG Brandon | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 97 | YOUNG Nash | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 6% |
| 98 | NOBLE Daniel | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 99 | YOUNG Brendon | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 100 | SMITH Mitchell M. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 101 | POPE Nico | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 102 | HONG Vincent Q. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 102 | RESHEIDAT Malik | 2% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 102 | MAHONEY Colin M. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 1% |
| 102 | KIM Noah L. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 106 | MORRILL Justin | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
| 107 | LI Joshua L. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 107 | MENSAH Kennedy C | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 109 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 109 | BERRIO Carter E. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 111 | ZHOU Kevin | - | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 112 | BERMAN Luca | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 113 | MILLER Levi H. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 114 | PORTMANN Stein J. | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 115 | GILMORE Thomas W. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 116 | HARGENRADER Kailen A. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 117 | YANG Richard | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 118 | UEYAMA Ietetsu A. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 118 | HASNAH Henry | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 120 | XU Luke | 21% | 43% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 121 | LUO ZIRUI | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 122 | ALKIN Isaac | 28% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 123 | CONINE Tanner C. | 3% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 124 | METTKE Nathaniel | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 125 | RYAN Edward T. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 125 | SHASHA zane | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 127 | KIM Andrew H. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 128 | ZHOU Miles | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 129 | KOGAN Benjamin | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 130 | BRAR Sanjeet | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 131 | QIN Alexander | 12% | 42% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 132 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 132 | LIU kelly | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 134 | FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 135 | LINSKY Matthew | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
| 136 | LAUDON Konrad | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 137 | KENNEDY Liam A. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 138 | GAFFNEY John M. | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 138 | CHANG Colin S. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 140 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 141 | CHIN Matthew W. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 141 | ALTIRS Alexander | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 143 | GORTON George F. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 144 | KEEFE Duncan | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 145 | TONG ZACHARY | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 146 | ASHBY Ethan J. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 147 | GHOSH Tuhin | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 147 | ZHOU Brian | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 149 | GINIS Nathan | - | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 150 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 151 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 152 | DELARUE NELSON Y. | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 153 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 154 | PAN Jerry | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 155 | GRASS James D. | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 156 | CHENG Kyle | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 157 | GREENE Alexander J. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 158 | REYES Xavier M. | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 159 | SMITLEY Tyler J. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 160 | HO Kaden M. | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 161 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
| 162 | XU Andrew | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 163 | BOURGHOL Matthew | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 164 | YUAN Kevin | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 165 | JINICH Ilan R. | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 166 | KAKEHI Nicholas B. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 167 | YUN Jake | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 168 | LEUNG Nathan | 40% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 168 | NEUHEARDT Peter | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 170 | DEWEY Charles J. | 32% | 45% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 171 | HUANG Eric | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 172 | BULL Anderson | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 173 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 173 | CHUPKIN Nikolas | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 175 | LU Caleb Q. | 16% | 44% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 175 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 5% | 31% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 177 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 177 | ZHOU Aeres Z. | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 179 | MENTA Varun | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 180 | DOUCET Justin P. | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 181 | PETRAMALE Samuel J. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | |
| 182 | CALKINS William H. | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 183 | MAGUIRE Matthew V. | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 184 | XU William | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 185 | MESHKOV Peter A. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 186 | WU Wilmund | 18% | 37% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 186 | MORRILL William | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% |
| 188 | PROCHAZKA Archer R. | 60% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 189 | LEITH Jack | 28% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 190 | HUANG Ethan F. | 1% | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 191 | NUMAN Yazan M. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 192 | RASMUSSEN Alexzander C. | 5% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 192 | CHEN Lucas B. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 194 | KAYDALIN Artyom | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 195 | FISK Ethan | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 196 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 197 | NARANJO David E. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 198 | BAUER Hank E. | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 198 | HUANG Tyler T. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 200 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 25% | 41% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 201 | REED Samuel J. | 19% | 56% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 202 | YOU Jaden | 35% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 203 | KOSURI Harsha | 36% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 204 | REINSCH-GOLDSTEIN Alexander N. | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 205 | ZHANG Michael (Jiayuan) | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 206 | SANFILIPPO-SCHERER Alexander G. | 20% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 207 | BANNERMAN Andrew J. | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 208 | CHAN Alexander S. | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 209 | COX Luis E. | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 210 | TANN Justin | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 211 | JOHNSON Langston C. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 212 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | < 1% | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 212 | GHENEA George Philipe | 23% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 214 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 215 | VO Minh Q. | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 215 | WANG Jonathan | 62% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 215 | NOBLE Colin | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 218 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | 16% | 42% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 219 | SHI Kyle | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 219 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 33% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 219 | HOUTZ Jackson | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 219 | WANG CIHANG | 58% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 223 | SAMMI Mukund | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 224 | LEE Justin | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 225 | BONSELL Vance | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 225 | SIERRA Brennan R. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 227 | HUANG Ian | 22% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.